← Teams

THPRD-Blebea/Rockwell

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.61 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Mary Green-Zwemke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Michele Sutherland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.73
Cheri Martes Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Anita Rockwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Vivian Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.24
Sandi Martes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Alison Marr
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.81
Suki Birge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Diana Blebea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-07-25Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesAnita Rockwell / Vivian Nguyen vs Suzie Glenn / Michele Snyder6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMary Green-Zwemke vs Kathy Ramsey6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlison Marr / Cheri Martes Davis vs Paula Jacobson / Jennifer Lucas7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Vicino / Michele Sutherland vs Jennie Brawn / Erin Hill6-3, 6-3
2021-07-17Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesAlison Marr / Vivian Nguyen vs Alison Davis / Michele Desmarais6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary Green-Zwemke vs Bethany Bounds7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Arnheim / Sandi Martes vs Mary Murphy / Kim Hasle6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiana Blebea / Anita Rockwell vs Marcy Bernhardt / Terri Gotcher6-3, 6-2
2021-07-11Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesAndrea Vicino / Vivian Nguyen vs Barbara Griffin / Kim Christensen6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMary Green-Zwemke vs Joy Kolesnikoff6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlison Marr / Suki Birge vs Chrys Culver / Sara Swanborn6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Blebea / Anita Rockwell vs Jacqui Slominski / Shella Razon-Lumetta4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-07-10Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesAnita Rockwell / Vivian Nguyen vs Michelle Posey / Dana Baioni6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary Green-Zwemke vs Kerri Patrick6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTonya Halog / Michele Sutherland vs Jeri Finn / Sharon Vipond6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Arnheim / Sandi Martes vs Cathy Koerner / Caroline Popma6-2, 6-0
2021-06-11Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesCheri Martes Davis / Vivian Nguyen vs Kayleen Mendenhall / Shannon Roarke3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary Green-Zwemke vs Kathy Cook7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlison Marr / Michele Sutherland vs Loo Yah Leong / Patricia Board6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSandi Martes / Tonya Halog vs Hong Huynh / Suzanne Chambers6-4, 6-1
2021-06-05Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesVivian Nguyen / Andrea Vicino vs Jin Velasco / Kaie Wellman6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMary Green-Zwemke vs May Graham6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichele Sutherland / Alison Marr vs Reiko Maeda / Miriam Habafy6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDiana Blebea / Suki Birge vs Nicole Floyd / Carla Scott7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Mary Green-Zwemke
79W–32L career
7%93%0%
4.05
4
Michele Sutherland
332W–175L career
0%87%13%
3.98
4
Cheri Martes Davis
106W–49L career
1%98%0%
3.73
3.5
Anita Rockwell
124W–51L career
0%80%20%
3.50
3.5
Vivian Nguyen
178W–99L career
0%98%2%
3.37
3.5
Sandi Martes
137W–98L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Alison Marr
70W–50L career
18%81%0%
3.10
3
Suki Birge
61W–80L career
0%98%1%
2.81
3
Diana Blebea
90W–67L career
3%97%0%
2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.