Teams

BW-Shue (18s 4.5M SP)

2026 Neuse River Adult 18 & Over League · 4.5 Men 18 & over

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-03vs GR-Taylor (18s 4.5M SP)Lost 23
W#1 DoublesRonan Boyle / David Osborne vs Quincy Edwards / Graham Toler6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTom Shoopman vs Dylan Costello4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEarl Henry Hostetler / Jacob Hostetler vs Winfield Warren / Thomas Hall6-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesTimothy Dickson vs William Hill1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrew Shue / Mark Gerhart vs Robby Taylor / Matt Turbeville1-6, 3-6
2026-04-28vs GR-Taylor (18s 4.5M SP)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesDavid Osborne / Samuel Hylton vs Dylan Costello / Stephen Reams3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSviatoslav Archava vs Graham Toler6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEarl Henry Hostetler / Hank Hostetler vs Alex Renfrow / Maxwell Gregson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRonan Boyle vs Winfield Warren5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesFabian Wayar / Mark Gerhart vs Robby Taylor / Richard Bansittidet5-7, 1-6
2026-04-25vs GR-Taylor (18s 4.5M SP)Split 22
W#1 DoublesSviatoslav Archava / David Osborne vs Courtney Harrell / Quincy Edwards6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTimothy Dickson vs Calvin Yurick2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMark Gerhart / Samuel Hylton vs Matt Turbeville / Tyler Haislip6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesTom Shoopman vs Alex Renfrow4-6, 2-6
2026-04-14vs GR-Taylor (18s 4.5M SP)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHank Hostetler / Jacob Hostetler vs Stephen Reams / Courtney Harrell3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSviatoslav Archava vs Winfield Warren3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFabian Wayar / Mark Gerhart vs Maxwell Gregson / Graham Toler0-6, 3-6
2026-04-07vs GR-Taylor (18s 4.5M SP)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesDavid Osborne / Thomas Stroud vs Robby Taylor / Alex Renfrow0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSviatoslav Archava vs Winfield Warren6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJacob Hostetler / Hank Hostetler vs Quincy Edwards / Dylan Costello0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRonan Boyle vs Thomas Hall6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesFabian Wayar / Mark Gerhart vs Graham Toler / Maxwell Gregson4-6, 1-6
2026-03-14vs GR-Taylor (18s 4.5M SP)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Osborne / Thomas Stroud vs Robby Taylor / Alex Renfrow6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTom Shoopman vs Calvin Yurick6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTimothy Dickson / Andrew Shue vs Quincy Edwards / Dylan Costello3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GR-Taylor (18s 4.5M SP)6022818198
2BW-Shue (18s 4.5M SP)0682247328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
David Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Fabian Wayar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Andrew Shue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.84
Tom Shoopman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.83
Sviatoslav Archava
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Jacob Hostetler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Timothy Dickson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.63
Ronan Boyle
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Mark Gerhart
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Hank Hostetler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Earl Henry Hostetler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samuel Hylton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Stroud
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hank Hostetler + Jacob Hostetler2341% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Shue + Timothy Dickson033 matchesnot enough data
Sviatoslav Archava + Mark Gerhart303 matchesnot enough data
Mark Gerhart + Fabian Wayar033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Osborne
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
Fabian Wayar
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.98
4.5
Andrew Shue
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
Tom Shoopman
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.84
Sviatoslav Archava
15W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.83
Jacob Hostetler
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Timothy Dickson
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.66
Ronan Boyle
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
Mark Gerhart
23W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.40
Hank Hostetler
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Earl Henry Hostetler
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Hylton
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Stroud
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.