Teams

Westchester Country Club

2022 18&Over Women Day Winter · 3.0 Day

22 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2022-04-15vs Maximum Tennis Development ZoneWon 21
L#1 DoublesJess Fuchs / Kathleen Long vs Catherine Chatham / Jennifer Sullivan1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Cahill / Jana Doty vs Nancy Kaplan / Veronika Roberts6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Julian / Deborah Maresca vs Loretta Lifrieri / Marianne Bateman6-1, 6-0
2022-03-22vs Sportime Lake IsleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJess Fuchs / Adrienne Flanagan vs Lisa Ferree / Heather Goldman3-6, 4-6
2022-03-09vs Tennis Club of HastingsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Julian / Caitlin Moffett vs Laura Chilton / IZABELLA ALEXANDROWSKI4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Flanagan / Jess Fuchs vs Helene Sorensen / Deborah Weinstein6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTara Crawford / Danielle Martell vs Heather Rhyu / Ellen Dumark6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-08vs Rye Racquet Club Black WidowsLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Dodge / Caitlin Moffett vs Sapna Canet / Deidre Kimble2-6, 4-6
2022-03-03vs Lifetime Athletic OpalLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaitlin Moffett / Lisa Dodge vs Clemencia Medina / Jane Doherty1-6, 0-6
2022-03-02vs Sportime Harbor IslandWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Moffett / Lauren Julian vs Medea Elvy / Elizabeth Bernstein6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Flanagan / Jess Fuchs vs Ulrike Heregger / Andrea Kischkat6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTara Crawford / Kathleen Long vs Lindsay Gourevitch / Colleen Kearney7-5, 6-4
2022-02-16vs Lifetime Athletic EmeraldLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Julian / Erika Lee vs Alicia Cintron / Susan Paxton0-6, 0-6
2022-02-16vs TIA GRINDERS 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Dodge / Caitlin Moffett vs Barbara Rosenthal / Jill Stafford2-6, 4-6
2022-02-09vs Sportime HI: Hits and GigglesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJess Fuchs / Danielle Martell vs Elana Minkove / Alison Bonaviso2-6, 6-7
2022-02-07vs SLI Pelham Forever InsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Allison / Lauren Julian vs Wenjuan Huang / Marjorie Shaw3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Martell / Jess Fuchs vs Chandra Turner / Mei Lau6-2, 6-3
2022-02-02vs Rye Racquet: Love Is NothingLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Moffett / Lauren Julian vs Kristen Hoft / Ellen Saya3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Flanagan / Jess Fuchs vs Julianne Schmidt / Kate Stempel3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDanielle Martell / Tara Crawford vs Stacy Lavelle / Doreen Gilligan4-6, 1-6
2022-01-24vs Sportime Harbor IslandLost 01
L#3 DoublesStacy Burns / Jess Fuchs vs Gunda Sabel-Sheehan / Bret Sommer2-6, 1-6
2022-01-20vs Old OaksWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaitlin Moffett / Angelika Seebacher vs Lisa Gladstone / Robin Potash5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-01-19vs NRRC: WonderwomenLost 03
L#1 DoublesJess Fuchs / Caitlin Moffett vs Kathryn Romita / Annie Berger6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTara Crawford / Lauren Julian vs Chris Gerosa / Shelley Wahl0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDanielle Martell / Deborah Maresca vs Nicole Fiftal / Margot Tohn7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Geatz
published 5
3.55
Jess Fuchs
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.10
Caitlin Moffett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.04
Molly Cahill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Lauren Julian
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.79
Danielle Martell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Adrienne Flanagan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Danielle Forster
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.73
Allison Brucato
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.68
RoseMarie Mecane
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Michele Allison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Joanne Rivers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.49
Deborah Maresca
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Erika Lee
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.23
Helen Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.03
Karina Verni
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kathleen Long
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Katie Bellmare
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristina McCooey
published
Tara Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Cahill + Allison Brucato7257% games+10.1% vs expected
Karina Verni + Helen Woods7549% games+6.4% vs expected
Caitlin Moffett + Jess Fuchs151151% games+6.3% vs expected
RoseMarie Mecane + Deborah Maresca1637% games+3.6% vs expected
Tara Crawford + Lauren Julian3359% games+3.1% vs expected
Karina Verni + Allison Brucato5752% games+1.8% vs expected
Erika Lee + Michele Allison4550% games−0.7% vs expected
Allison Brucato + Danielle Forster111546% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
David Geatz
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jess Fuchs
64W–35L career · 9 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Caitlin Moffett
63W–78L career · 8 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Molly Cahill
29W–16L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
Lauren Julian
41W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Danielle Martell
25W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Adrienne Flanagan
20W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Danielle Forster
16W–25L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Allison Brucato
50W–54L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
RoseMarie Mecane
30W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Michele Allison
35W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Joanne Rivers
45W–62L career · 8 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60
3
Deborah Maresca
35W–55L career · 9 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Erika Lee
12W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Helen Woods
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.23
Karina Verni
37W–78L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Kathleen Long
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katie Bellmare
35W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Brennan
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristina McCooey
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Ugliarolo-McKay
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tara Crawford
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.