Teams

KHeidkamp (PCC)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-30vs KO'Shea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)Lost 13
W#1 DoublesKristin Heidkamp / Christine Leavitt vs Carrie Kramer / Shelby Stahl6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesCharlotte Renner vs Virginia Molan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Koonts / Penny Hill vs Rebecca Fitzsimons / Morgan Peterson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStacy Figgs Sokhi / Susie Fragale vs Jessica Babinski / SUSAN ALIOTA7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-23vs ASunden (Raintree)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesChristine Leavitt vs Kimberly Rupnarine3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Messmer / Charlotte Renner vs Jill Smith / Nicole Love6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKristin Heidkamp vs Erin Moser7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-16vs RAddison/KMoore (Park Road)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesPenny Hill / Carolyn Koonts vs Anna Margaret Hutchins / Mary Kathryn Lozzi6-0, 7-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Suppa vs Sallie Wilson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStacy Figgs Sokhi / Michele Messmer vs Belle Landzert / Catherine Tharp6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-09vs NO'Brien/OBanchik (Life Time)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesKristin Heidkamp / Christine Leavitt vs Naomi O'Brien / Anura Patel6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Messmer / Penny Hill vs Madelaine LeBlanc / Olya Banchik6-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCarolyn Koonts vs Heather Enlow-Novitsky4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacy Figgs Sokhi / Susie Fragale vs Annika Leintz / Sabrina Gregory1-6, 1-6
2025-04-02vs JCarney (PPRSC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Leavitt / Penny Hill vs Nanci Weil / Laura Grant6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Figgs Sokhi / Charlotte Renner vs Corinne McBrier / Angela MacMurphy6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusie Fragale / Michele Messmer vs Molly Clune / Beth Dunn6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-26vs LHuntington (Mason Wallace)Split 22
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Renner / Christine Leavitt vs Julie Moore / Catherine Crigler6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKristin Heidkamp vs Laura Case1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStacy Figgs Sokhi / Michele Messmer vs Pam Bright / Punky Brick7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Suppa vs Joanne Lee7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-19vs NHaskins/JLee (Park Road)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesKristin Heidkamp / Penny Hill vs Nikki Haskins / Stacey Whitney4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCharlotte Renner vs Jenny Kim2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStacy Figgs Sokhi / Michele Messmer vs Kris Jones / Cathy Cagney1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Suppa vs Jane Lee1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSusie Fragale / Lisa Long vs Felicia Ahn / Elisa Salim3-6, 1-6
2025-03-12vs KLull (Blakeney)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Leavitt / Penny Hill vs Rachel Grantham / Deepti Dua5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Renner vs Wendy Rossi6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMichele Messmer vs Kristen Dodds7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-05vs MMetzl (Sardis)Split 11
W#1 SinglesKristin Heidkamp vs Haddon MacKie6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichele Messmer / Susie Fragale vs Patricia Phelan / Sharon Storck5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carolyn Koonts
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Christine Leavitt
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Charlotte Renner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristin Heidkamp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Michele Messmer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3
2.86
Jean Kreisher
published
2.85
Stacy Figgs Sokhi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Elizabeth Suppa
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Susie Fragale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Heidkamp + Christine Leavitt8356% games+2.3% vs expected
Christine Leavitt + Charlotte Renner3258% gamesnot enough data
Michele Messmer + Stacy Figgs Sokhi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolyn Koonts
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christine Leavitt
68W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Charlotte Renner
24W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Kristin Heidkamp
89W–89L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Michele Messmer
48W–57L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Jean Kreisher
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.86
Stacy Figgs Sokhi
2W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Elizabeth Suppa
5W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Susie Fragale
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.