Teams

BB:Cistulli:Siegel

2023 NH Adult 65 & Over Men · 8.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-16vs MTS:King:FosterLost 03
L#1 DoublesGlen Mayberry / Peter Russo vs David Foster / Lee Herrington5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Heard / Kent Hemingway vs Tom Nieva / Terry Gould1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPhilip Cistulli / Bill Shee vs Richard King / Jon Judge6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-11vs MTS:King:FosterWon 30
W#1 DoublesRonald Lafond / David Unger vs Donald Sargent / Richard Aseltine6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAdam Heard / Kent Hemingway vs Richard King / Terry Gould6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPhilip Cistulli / Jeffrey Siegel vs Lee Herrington / Jon Judge6-2, 6-2
2023-05-24vs MTS:King:FosterLost 12
W#1 DoublesBruce Leibig / Jeffrey Siegel vs David Foster / Ken Limburg6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRonald Lafond / David Unger vs Tom Nieva / Mitchell Utell6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGlen Mayberry / Peter Russo vs Lee Herrington / Jon Judge2-6, 4-6
2023-05-07vs MTS:King:FosterWon 21
L#1 DoublesBill Shee / Bruce Leibig vs David Foster / Ken Limburg3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRonald Lafond / David Unger vs Tom Nieva / Richard Aseltine6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Heard / Jeffrey Siegel vs Donald Sargent / Mitchell Utell6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruce Leibig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Glen Mayberry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Adam Heard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Bill Shee
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
David Unger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jeffrey Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kent Hemingway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Philip Cistulli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ronald Lafond
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronald Lafond + David Unger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruce Leibig
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Glen Mayberry
38W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Adam Heard
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Bill Shee
6W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
David Unger
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffrey Siegel
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kent Hemingway
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Philip Cistulli
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ronald Lafond
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.