Teams

BING: Slayers

2026 Tri Level Men · Silver: 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.55 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-05vs Slice GuysLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Lange / Noah Lenkin vs Joseph Hommel / Benjamin Kammerman4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Santos Jentsch / D Rizzo vs Darren la Padula / Patrick Guy2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTJ Ciaravino / COLLIN FERRARO vs Trevor Doan / Rohan Chatterjee6-0, 6-1
2026-03-29vs Slice GuysLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Lange / Dustin Tang-Chung vs Howard Brown / Daniel Williams4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGarrett Stoyell / Isaac Weissmann vs Patrick Guy / Zeke Saber6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCOLLIN FERRARO / Asif Saifullah vs Jerry Severino / Andrew Holmes3-6, 4-6
2026-03-26vs Slice GuysWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Xia / Denis Khrapko vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Santos Jentsch / Matthew Lange vs Zeke Saber / Howard Brown2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAsif Saifullah / TJ Ciaravino vs Jerry Severino / Trevor Doan6-2, 6-3
2026-03-14vs Slice GuysWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenis Khrapko / Ryan Xia vs Benjamin Kammerman / Darren la Padula6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoah Lenkin / Harsh Patel vs Patrick Guy / Zeke Saber4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLeo O'Connor / Asif Saifullah vs Andrew Holmes / Jerry Severino6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-14vs Slice GuysWon 21
L#1 DoublesHarsh Patel / Dustin Tang-Chung vs Joseph Hommel / Ryan Mirch2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesIsaac Weissmann / Garrett Stoyell vs Howard Brown / Darren la Padula6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeo O'Connor / COLLIN FERRARO vs Rohan Chatterjee / Andrew Holmes7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-28vs Slice GuysWon 20
W#2 DoublesGarrett Stoyell / Isaac Weissmann vs Howard Brown / Zeke Saber6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCOLLIN FERRARO / TJ Ciaravino vs Trevor Doan / Rohan Chatterjee6-2, 6-1
2026-02-21vs Slice GuysWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Xia / Emmanuel Bellido vs Daniel Williams / Benjamin Kammerman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNoah Lenkin / D Rizzo vs Patrick Guy / Darren la Padula6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCOLLIN FERRARO / TJ Ciaravino vs Rohan Chatterjee / Andrew Holmes6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Silver: 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Ryan Xia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Emmanuel Bellido
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Denis Khrapko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Dustin Tang-Chung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Harsh Patel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Isaac Weissmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Garrett Stoyell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Noah Lenkin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
TJ Ciaravino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
D Rizzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Matthew Lange
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
COLLIN FERRARO
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Benjamin Santos Jentsch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Leo O'Connor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Asif Saifullah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garrett Stoyell + Isaac Weissmann10166% games+13.1% vs expected
Leo O'Connor + COLLIN FERRARO4162% games+8.0% vs expected
Leo O'Connor + TJ Ciaravino2642% games+4.2% vs expected
Benjamin Santos Jentsch + Matthew Lange2346% gamesnot enough data
Denis Khrapko + Ryan Xia314 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Lange + COLLIN FERRARO314 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Santos Jentsch + D Rizzo033 matchesnot enough data
TJ Ciaravino + COLLIN FERRARO303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Xia
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Emmanuel Bellido
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Denis Khrapko
3W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Dustin Tang-Chung
48W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Harsh Patel
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Isaac Weissmann
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Garrett Stoyell
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Noah Lenkin
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
TJ Ciaravino
43W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
D Rizzo
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Matthew Lange
50W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
COLLIN FERRARO
15W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
3.5
Benjamin Santos Jentsch
31W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Leo O'Connor
58W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Asif Saifullah
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.