Teams

LATA55/Simpson/CTFC

2023 Combo 55 & Over - STA · Adult Women - 8.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Fuerst
published 4.5
Cathy Taylor
published 4.5
4.24
Rolfe Olsen
published
4.23
Sharon Lewis
published
4.16
Suzanne Gray
published
4.08
Stacey Hewson
published
4.06
Jennie Lambe
published
4.05
Julian Horst
published
3.70
Melissa Prickett
published
3.66
Kathy Foster
published
3.65
Eugenia Hardwick
published 4
3.63
Lisa Echols
published
3.62
Mary Garvin
published
3.62
Debbie Laney
published 4
3.53
Robin Simpson
published
3.41
Debbie Holland
published 3.5
3.34
Karen Thompson
published
Donna Bull
published 3.5
Susan Jermstad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Bull + Eugenia Hardwick4163% games+5.9% vs expected
Lisa Echols + Kathy Foster8554% games−1.0% vs expected
Debbie Laney + Kathy Foster2350% games−1.0% vs expected
Kathy Foster + Karen Thompson4357% games−1.1% vs expected
Melissa Prickett + Julian Horst4152% games−4.2% vs expected
Debbie Laney + Eugenia Hardwick3255% games−7.5% vs expected
Stacey Hewson + Jennie Lambe3550% gamesnot enough data
Julian Horst + Sharon Lewis6164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Fuerst
39W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Cathy Taylor
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rolfe Olsen
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
4.24
Sharon Lewis
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
Suzanne Gray
6W–26L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.16
Stacey Hewson
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
Jennie Lambe
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
4.06
Julian Horst
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.05
Melissa Prickett
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Kathy Foster
67W–50L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Eugenia Hardwick
52W–58L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
Lisa Echols
61W–40L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
Mary Garvin
32W–33L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Debbie Laney
21W–24L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Robin Simpson
71W–44L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Debbie Holland
26W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.41
Karen Thompson
78W–63L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Donna Bull
34W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Jermstad
20W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.