Teams

Crashers

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Women 3.0 - 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-16vs Summit SmashersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Clark / Jacqueline Wroble vs Kristie Hepburn / Sarah Benedict1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesClaire Hugman vs Kym Tranel6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLynn Dykstra vs Julie Wenz7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-15vs Summit SmashersLost 04
L#1 DoublesKristin Davis / Kelly Clark vs Kym Tranel / Linda Carruthers0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLynn Dykstra vs Julie Wenz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAbby Luke / Claire Hugman vs Sarah Benedict / Laura Ennis2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLynae Barnett / Jacqueline Wroble vs Emily Zemacke / Jodi Gray2-6, 2-6
2024-06-15vs Summit SmashersLost 13
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Wroble / Abby Luke vs Laura Ennis / Jodi Gray2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesClaire Hugman vs Emily Zemacke6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Clark / Lynae Barnett vs Linda Carruthers / Kristie Hepburn3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKristin Davis vs Julie Wenz6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-14vs Summit SmashersLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristin Davis / Julie Patzer vs Linda Carruthers / Kristie Hepburn1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLynn Dykstra vs Kym Tranel4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Clark / Kaitlin Smolen vs Laura Ennis / Jodi Gray6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesClaire Hugman / Jacqueline Wroble vs Sarah Benedict / Emily Zemacke2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 - 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Kaitlin Smolen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Claire Hugman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Kristin Davis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Abby Luke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jacqueline Wroble
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Patzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Clark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lynae Barnett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lynn Dykstra
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaitlin Smolen
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Claire Hugman
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Kristin Davis
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Abby Luke
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jacqueline Wroble
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Patzer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Clark
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynae Barnett
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynn Dykstra
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.