Teams

Brown - TCC

Mixed Tri-Level Tournament · 7.0-9.0 Mixed Tri-Level Tournament

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-02-14vs OhnemusWon 10
W#2 Mixed DoublesLawsen Lobatos-Dick / Michelle Bettis vs Lara Maple / Jeff Ganaden6-3, 6-3
2026-02-14vs KS-EcclesWon 10
W#2 Mixed DoublesLawsen Lobatos-Dick / Michelle Bettis vs Jason Shipp / Rebekah Berkley5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0-9.0 Mixed Tri-Level Tournament
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brown - TCC3072573
2KS-Eccles226613106
3Ohnemus03271495

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Ashton Sparks
published 4.5
4.14
Mason Thieu
published
4.11
Michelle Bettis
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Lawsen Lobatos-Dick
published
3.44
Rachel Seitz
published
3.30
Emily Skrobacz
published
3.27
Loren Lobatos-Dick
published
2.81
Nicole Meier
published
Billy Skrobacz
published
Mel Brown
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashton Sparks
92W–17L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Mason Thieu
9W–18L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.14
Michelle Bettis
75W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
4.11
Lawsen Lobatos-Dick
28W–5L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Rachel Seitz
124W–64L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Emily Skrobacz
35W–18L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Loren Lobatos-Dick
21W–42L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Nicole Meier
32W–25L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Billy Skrobacz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mel Brown
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.