Teams

B1 ACAC Delisio

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-08vs B9 Avalon CalhounWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Delisio / William Fields vs William Street / Richard Bland2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Johnston / Jesse Smith vs Darrell Jervey / Mike Bott7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJohn Delisio / William Fields vs Spencer Carter / John Le6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJesse Smith vs Tony Jimenez6-1, 6-1
2021-05-16vs B7 Willow Oaks BlackwoodLost 02
L#1 DoublesJesse Smith / John Johnston vs Terence Blackwood / Agustin Rodriguez4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Delisio / Amir Tavassoli vs William Tate / John Port6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-02vs B2 James River Stephens Surge 3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Fields / John Delisio vs Heath Flohre / David Aschheim6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJesse Smith / Joseph Cipolla vs Antonio Moreno Camacho / Paul Haley6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJohn Delisio / William Fields vs Gary Wills / Michael Westhoven2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJohn Delisio / William Fields vs KANNAN VIVEKANANDAN / Nagarjuna Challa6-2, 6-4
2021-04-11vs B8 Ridgetop GivenWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Johnston / Jesse Smith vs Eddie Garrett / Carter Berry7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJohn Delisio vs Jay Harter6-3, 6-2
2021-04-04vs B6 Woodlake McCoy Triple FaultsWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Fields / John Delisio vs Peter Schneeberger / Dave McCoy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJesse Smith / Joseph Cipolla vs Wray Brawley / Jeff Moore6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Jesse Smith
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
3.33
Toussaint Manley
published
3.33
Steve Leighty
published
3.31
Ken Hatcher
published
3.23
John Delisio
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.17
Joseph Cipolla
published
2.77
George Drudge
published 3
Scott McFadden
published
William Fields
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Delisio + Jesse Smith151253% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jesse Smith
166W–117L career · 6 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51
Venkatachelam Regulagedda
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
Toussaint Manley
10W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%89%10%
3.33
Steve Leighty
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Ken Hatcher
15W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
John Delisio
178W–167L career · 8 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Joseph Cipolla
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3
George Drudge
10W–16L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Scott McFadden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
William Fields
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.