Teams

Team Miller

2023 NOVA Singles Women · NOVA Singles 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-28vs All the Single LadiesWon 10
W#2 SinglesTara Jefferson vs Cate Le6-0, 5-4
2023-10-27vs Team Vroman-LeeLost 01
L#3 SinglesTara Jefferson vs Eve Pandit3-6, 3-6
2023-10-04Lost 01
L#3 SinglesTara Jefferson vs Christina Saxon6-7
2023-09-15vs Triple ThreatWon 10
W#3 SinglesTara Jefferson vs Anne Ward6-4, 2-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Cameron Craig
published 4
3.75
Nancy Henry
published
3.32
Ana Donovan
published 3.5
3.29
Susan Velasco
published
Chloe Zhang
published 3.5
3.07
Karla Zedan
published
2.95
Tara Jefferson
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Laurie Bennett
published
Marisa Maisiak
published
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Velasco + Millette Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cameron Craig
44W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
Nancy Henry
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Ana Donovan
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Susan Velasco
51W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Chloe Zhang
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karla Zedan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Tara Jefferson
185W–158L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
Laurie Bennett
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marisa Maisiak
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.