Teams

Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills

2024 Foothills Spring 18 & Over League · Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-21vs vonAllmen/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Taylor Austin3-6, 0-6
2024-05-07vs Barefoot/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Kristine Hutton6-3, 6-2
2024-04-23vs Kim/RockBarn/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Nina Scopes7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Ann Gerson2-6, 3-6
2024-04-16vs Geyer-Shafer/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Staci Shafer6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Sherrill / Carolyn Carlile vs Marianna Geyer / Linda Schultz4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-09vs vonAllmen/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Joanna Urs6-1, 6-0
2024-04-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Brooke Church7-5, 6-1
2024-03-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Shokes / Rhonda Laxton vs Susan Davis / Beth Martin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Wendy Walker6-3, 6-3
2024-02-27vs Kim/RockBarn/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Shokes / Rachel Good vs Pam Britt / Kathy Collins6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTamara Fidler / Carolyn Carlile vs Sara Griffith / Amy Lawton0-6, 2-6
2024-02-20vs Geyer-Shafer/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Shokes / Liza Dellinger vs Lauren Everley / Tabitha Lindsay6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Karen Shokes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.04
Rachel Good
published
2.73
Olivia Good
published
2.67
Maria Sherrill
published
2.43
Carolyn Carlile
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
Liza Dellinger
published
Rhonda Laxton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olivia Good + Rachel Good314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Shokes
176W–84L career · 10 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
Rachel Good
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Olivia Good
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Maria Sherrill
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
2.5
Carolyn Carlile
50W–81L career · 10 lines in 2024
0%68%32%
2.43
Liza Dellinger
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rhonda Laxton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.