Teams

SMacintosh (Charlotte Indoor)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Wed PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-03vs EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#2 DoublesWill Lewis III / Gregory Vlahos vs Kenneth Dorado / Thad Walton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-19vs DDeMaine/RVojjini (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWill Lewis III / Hunter Cannon vs Rakesh Kumar Vojjini / Cameron Lober0-6, 4-6
2023-04-05vs KFox (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesWill Lewis III vs Robert Shore3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Winterich / Beau Bagley vs Paul Roza / Brandon Wright0-6, 3-6
2023-03-29vs XTang (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Winterich / Nick Jermyn vs Yuefeng Han / Yiding Guo6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHunter Cannon / Will Lewis III vs Xuezhi Tang / Yiping Zhuang6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-15vs JConklin (Carmel Country Club)Split 11
W#2 DoublesGregory Vlahos / Jeff Winterich vs John Conklin / Carter Morgan6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWill Lewis III / Beau Bagley vs Tom Parker / Giles Baker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-08vs EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesWill Lewis III vs David Shevsky2-6, 1-6
2023-03-01vs ABackus (Southampton)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesWill Lewis III vs Robert Kampmeyer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Winterich / Rajeshwer Subramanian vs Chris Turbyfill / Ronnie Melker1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Jeff Winterich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Hunter Cannon
published 3.5
3.16
Will Lewis III
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.11
Scott MacIntosh
published
3.08
Erik Stokkebye
published 3.5
2.97
Gregory Vlahos
published 3.5
Tom Sandy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Stokkebye + Scott MacIntosh3248% gamesnot enough data
Will Lewis III + Hunter Cannon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Winterich
31W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Hunter Cannon
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Will Lewis III
37W–85L career · 7 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Scott MacIntosh
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Erik Stokkebye
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Gregory Vlahos
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Rajeshwer Subramanian
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Sandy
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.