Teams

Augustine 18+ 3.0 Singles Wed PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 3.0 Men Singles Wed

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-23vs King 18+ 3.0M Singles Wed PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Jack Royals6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAnders Gustavsson vs Stephen Ingram3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Augustine vs BRIAN KING2-6, 1-6
2025-07-14Won 20
W#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs William Davis6-3, 2-5
W#2 SinglesAnders Gustavsson vs Kenneth Smith6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs William Craft5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChip Roth vs Noah Carlson1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRyan Augustine vs Jack Monroe3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-18vs King 18+ 3.0M Singles Wed PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Chris Sigley2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGene LeFevre vs Kevin VanVooren3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAnders Gustavsson vs Sean Jones1-6, 3-6
2025-06-04Won 21
W#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Donald O'Brien7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesGene LeFevre vs Kenneth Smith6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesRyan Augustine vs William Davis2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJason Lewis vs William Craft6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesChip Roth vs Jack Monroe3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Augustine vs Noah Carlson1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men Singles Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Jason Lewis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Luke Mills
published
2.89
Jackson Honeycutt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
John Little
published
2.84
Anders Gustavsson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Gene LeFevre
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.44
Chip Roth
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Ryan Augustine
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Lewis
29W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Luke Mills
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
2.98
Jackson Honeycutt
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
John Little
11W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Anders Gustavsson
9W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Carson Wannamaker
1W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gene LeFevre
22W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
2.5
Chip Roth
3W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
Ryan Augustine
2W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.