Teams

GSTL55/Lane/Stables

2025 Adult 55 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-08vs GSTL55/Paudel/DunesLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Baxley / Kimberly Leatherwood vs Mary Singleton / Katie Sandoz6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNancy Costin / Teri Guyer vs Tracy Davenport / Dipti Paudel2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Lane / Polly McCray vs Myla Butler / Shai Kahn6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-02-01vs GSTL55/Paudel/DunesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Pope / Beth Baxley vs Shai Kahn / Katie Sandoz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Lane / Kimberly Leatherwood vs Myla Butler / Tracy Davenport6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPolly McCray / Glenn Wilcox vs Deborah Conner / Linda Smith6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Beth Baxley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Polly McCray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Julie Pope
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Linda Lane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Glenn Wilcox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Teri Guyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Nancy Costin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Kimberly Leatherwood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Pope + Glenn Wilcox213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Pope + Beth Baxley213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Lane + Polly McCray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Baxley
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Polly McCray
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Julie Pope
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Linda Lane
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Glenn Wilcox
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Teri Guyer
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Nancy Costin
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Kimberly Leatherwood
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.