Teams

SGV Queens of the Court-Fruits-Arroyo Seco/SU4

2024 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesAndrea Fruits / Melissa Jansson vs Alana Vormehr / Alexandra Steele Cooper6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesEliza Llobrera vs Alena Ananyeva6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDebra Sudo / Melissa Jansson vs Keum Ko / Hyo Jung Kim1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEliza Llobrera / Irene Zaragoza vs Chelle Farquhar / Angeline Chow6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-11vs SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Hao-WN/SASplit 11
W#1 DoublesMay Low / Johanna Baumann vs Sophia Chang / GINA SKIBAR6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMelissa Jansson vs Demmi Setyono0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesMelissa Jansson / May Low vs Julie Sheehy / Brenda MacEo6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEliza Llobrera / Linda Lopez vs Kathy Aicher / Hilary Scofield3-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesAndrea Fruits / Melissa Jansson vs Noanie Rofoli / Sandra Rachild6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Annemarie Schnedler
published 3.5
3.00
Trecia Mendoza
published
2.98
Debra Sudo
published 3
2.96
DARCELIA WILSON
published 3
2.93
Linda Lopez
published
2.91
May Low
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Andrea Fruits
published 3
2.85
Melissa Jansson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.77
Eliza Llobrera
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Johanna Baumann
published
2.73
Susan Biales
published
2.70
2.67
Irene Zaragoza
published
2.64
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Sudo + Linda Lopez9458% games+10.2% vs expected
DARCELIA WILSON + Trecia Mendoza9264% games+6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annemarie Schnedler
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Trecia Mendoza
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Debra Sudo
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
DARCELIA WILSON
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
2.96
Linda Lopez
27W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
May Low
28W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Andrea Fruits
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Melissa Jansson
45W–36L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Eliza Llobrera
121W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Johanna Baumann
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan Biales
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Camille Farnsworth
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Irene Zaragoza
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Christina Buckley
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.