Teams

EAnderson (Queens)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-01vs KAllen (Raintree)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesEmilia Anderson / Madelynn Bates vs Karen Allen / Kimberly Rupnarine2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDevon Fuller / Emma SEGAL vs Stacy Andrews / Lesley Quick6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-09-24vs KCronin/Ferguson (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKatie White / Madelynn Bates vs Lindsey Ferguson / Anne Coskey2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-10vs HHigh/PStyers (Southampton)Won 10
W#3 DoublesRACHEL Patterson / Devon Fuller vs Teri Iezzi / Andrea Cossette6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-03vs DAlexander/KKuehner (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Skjoedt / Madelynn Bates vs Lori DiFazio / Debbie Alexander5-7, 4-6
2025-08-27vs AWilloughby (River Hills)Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmilia Anderson / Madelynn Bates vs Sophie Karsch / Melissa Misplay6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Caroline Skjoedt
published 3.5
3.32
Devon Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.31
CC Shellabarger
published 3.5
3.10
Emma SEGAL
published 3
3.05
Emilia Anderson
published
3.00
Madelynn Bates
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Allie Doub
published 3
2.67
Lindsay Lillibridge
published
2.66
RACHEL Patterson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emma SEGAL + Emilia Anderson7168% games+8.6% vs expected
Emma SEGAL + Devon Fuller404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Skjoedt
14W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3
Devon Fuller
96W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
CC Shellabarger
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3
Emma SEGAL
28W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Emilia Anderson
37W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3
Madelynn Bates
53W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Allie Doub
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Lindsay Lillibridge
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
RACHEL Patterson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.