Teams

Weidlein/Randall

2024 South East Tennis Combo 55 & over · Womens 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-21vs McKenna / Doerr (Day)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hartnett / Melissa Martin vs Holly Yoo / Sheryl Doerr7-6, 6-2
2024-09-18vs Richard/FaniaLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Martin / Kathleen Murphy vs Lynn Norris / Karen Wall6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-11vs Campbell (DAY)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Martin / Lisa Toomey vs Kelly Godfrey / Liz Govoni1-6, 3-6
2024-08-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Martin / Jennifer Gick vs Billie Fitzsimons / Sharon Smith2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-08-19vs McCallLost 01
L#2 DoublesPhyllis Sheets / Melissa Martin vs Odette Arnold / Barbara Pennington3-6, 3-6
2024-08-11vs Coco/Messier (Day)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Martin / Phyllis Sheets vs Debbie Canty / Sharon Wesson2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jennifer Hartnett
published
3.37
Phyllis Sheets
published
3.35
Melissa Martin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Ann Schuelke
published 3.5
3.32
Clarke Weidlein
published 3.5
3.30
Lisa Toomey
published
3.29
Lois Randall
published
3.17
Jennifer Gick
published
3.06
Marlene Fricano
published
3.02
Mia Delmontagne
published
3.01
Karen O'Connor
published
2.98
Kathleen Murphy
published
Sabrina Nikel
published
Susan Barry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Gick + Kathleen Murphy134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hartnett
17W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.81
Phyllis Sheets
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Melissa Martin
58W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Ann Schuelke
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Clarke Weidlein
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Lisa Toomey
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Lois Randall
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Jennifer Gick
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.17
Marlene Fricano
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
Mia Delmontagne
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Karen O'Connor
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Kathleen Murphy
14W–25L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Sabrina Nikel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Barry
32W–24L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.