← TeamsSTC-Pirates-Gravenkemper
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
1 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON
Scouting
Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
3.54
Andrew Russinusually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results6 ties
2023-06-24Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Barnes / Andrew Russin vs Steve Buckingham / Daniel Higgins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-24Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Barnes / Andrew Russin vs Steve Eggerts / Ken Nichols7-6, 6-1
2023-03-10Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Russin / Hamilton Oswald vs Dave Evans / Badrinath Vengalathur6-1, 7-6
2023-03-05Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesDavid Gravenkemper / Andrew Russin vs Peter Gregory / Steven Ruhoy5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-24Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Russin / Kevin Shearer vs Christopher Gipson / Bryan Hester1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-12-04Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesRonald Mulberg / Andrew Russin vs David Jacobsen / John Medina3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete.
Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.
Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.