Teams

McNEICE

2022 Loudoun Adult Other Winter Afternoon Doubles Women · Adult Other Afternoon Doubles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-17vs O'DONNELLLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Decker / Marguerite McFadden vs Lisa Furgal / Kelli O'Donnell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-10vs BUTLERLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Karen McNeice vs Sharon DiRenzo / Kimianne Lee0-6, 4-6
2022-02-16vs FRIEDMANLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren McNeice / Sarah Matcher vs Anne McDonald / Megan Sultan2-6, 3-6
2022-02-10vs O'DONNELLLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Kerr / Marguerite McFadden vs Leanne Drake / Donna James3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-02-01vs BUTLERLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarguerite McFadden / Sarah Matcher vs Kimberly Butler / Rita Barufka4-6, 0-6
2022-01-28vs McMANUSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmanda Kerr / Marguerite McFadden vs Eleanor McManus / Laleh Packard6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaren McNeice / Jennifer Seymour vs Michelle Antzoulatos / Kate Trask5-7, 4-6
2022-01-12vs FRIEDMANWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarguerite McFadden / Tara Reynolds vs Alison Lopez / Angela Tomaszewski2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Other Afternoon Doubles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Amanda Kerr
published 4
3.44
Tara Reynolds
published
3.40
Karyn DeVito
published 3.5
3.28
Marguerite McFadden
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.98
Jennifer Decker
published
2.98
Effie Hoffman
published 3
2.68
Sarah Matcher
published
2.56
Karen McNeice
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Robin Crawford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marguerite McFadden + Karyn DeVito261653% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Kerr
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Tara Reynolds
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Karyn DeVito
141W–116L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Marguerite McFadden
95W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Jennifer Decker
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Effie Hoffman
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
Sarah Matcher
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Karen McNeice
42W–55L career · 7 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
Robin Crawford
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.