← Teams

SHC-Graham

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Shelly Perkins
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.66
Toni Kidd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Kristen Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Donna Feuerherdt
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Linda Graham
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
—
Maureen Mader
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Victoria Cartwright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Trank
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Nancy Kane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Nancy Heck
published 3
Results8 ties
2024-11-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKristen Fisher / Victoria Cartwright vs Ann Cassin / Beth Kempton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShelly Perkins / Elicia Putnam vs Sandra Ellis / Susie Garland7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaureen Mader / Cricket Forsey vs Gina Ariosa / Jeny Joseph6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-17Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesShelly Perkins / Lisa McBee vs Caroline Hall / Kathleen Cooney6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Feuerherdt / Jennifer Trank vs Amy Thomas / Barbra Jorgensen6-2, 6-3
2024-11-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesLucila Griesser / Shelly Perkins vs Barbra Jorgensen / Amy Thomas6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNancy Kane / Maureen Mader vs Wendy Hill / Sara Weinstein6-2, 6-3
2024-11-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesToni Kidd / Lucila Griesser vs Sammie Sue Willenborg / Lisa Wisthoff6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Graham / Jennifer Trank vs Karen Groenweghe / Christine Taylor6-3, 7-5
2024-10-27Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Trank / Donna Feuerherdt vs Jean Zuber Marshburn / Jeanette Thomas7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Fisher / Victoria Cartwright vs Ann Arp / Kaie Wellman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-06Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesLisa McBee / Linda Graham vs Sarah Mutal / May Graham6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDonna Feuerherdt / Jennifer Trank vs Kimbra Kasch / Mary Priester7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Heck / Kristen Fisher vs Sheryl Riley / Michelle DeVaughn7-5, 6-1
2024-09-27Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesNancy Heck / Toni Kidd vs Wendy Simons / Lee Gates7-6, 6-3
2024-09-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDonna Feuerherdt / Lucila Griesser vs Joanne Maginnis / Kerry Sanford4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Graham / Lisa McBee vs Sandra Ellis / Bernadette Lisac6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNancy Kane / Cricket Forsey vs Beth Kempton / Gina Ariosa3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Shelly Perkins
16W–16L career
not enough data
—
4
Toni Kidd
57W–59L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Kristen Fisher
67W–52L career
8%92%0%
3.65
4
Donna Feuerherdt
65W–68L career
13%87%0%
3.60
4
Linda Graham
76W–76L career
35%65%0%
3.50
3.5
Maureen Mader
20W–12L career
not enough data
—
3
Victoria Cartwright
58W–80L career
0%83%17%
2.96
3
Jennifer Trank
93W–104L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Nancy Kane
15W–30L career · type A
not enough data
—
3
Nancy Heck
17W–17L career
6%92%2%
2.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.