Teams

MAC-Henderson

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.86 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Donald Brenneman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
David Hill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Ben Jacobson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Jonathan Barg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Bill Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.26
Tim Leatherman
published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results10 ties
2023-11-12Split 11
L#2 DoublesKit Johnson / Jonathan Barg vs Eric Goldner / Patrick Maginnis6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesZachary Wright / David White vs Hyungje Woo / Gregory Gonzalez3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-05Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBill Henderson / Jack Henry vs Mike Farrell / Bill Rhoades6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBen Jacobson / Steven Wilker vs Chris Eddy / Jonathan Caplan6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Hill / Mark Stromme vs Patrick Trank / Matthew Trank6-0, 6-4
2023-10-28Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSteven Wilker / Bill Henderson vs Rymn Parsons / Mitchell Whitehurst6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDonald Brenneman / Jonathan Barg vs Francisco Rivera-Giusti / Shung Shin6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTim Leatherman / David Hill vs Michael Kazangian / Steve Sun6-2, 6-2
2023-10-22Won 20
W#1 DoublesJonathan Barg / Bill Henderson vs Danny Denning / Patrick Harkin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Leatherman / David Hill vs Warren Hill / Michael Sheridan7-6, 6-2
2023-10-20Won 20
W#1 DoublesJack Henry / Bill Henderson vs Frank Olson / Min Lee6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid White / Zachary Wright vs Len Morales / Tim Luangrath6-4, 6-1
2023-10-14Split 11
W#1 DoublesJack Henry / Bill Henderson vs Charlie Dolezal / Malcolm Baker6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJonathan Barg / Mark Stromme vs Edwin Becker / Jerome Deluz6-1, 6-4
2023-10-06Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBill Henderson / Jack Henry vs Patrick Herbst / John Hall6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Hill / Donald Brenneman vs James Ringelberg / Jim Fredericks6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTim Leatherman / Ben Jacobson vs Kevin Pedigo / Brian Jones6-1, 6-0
2023-10-01Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBen Jacobson / Steven Wilker vs Matt Bolte / Martin McClanan7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Hill / Jack Henry vs Matt Thayer / Paul Stutzman6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDonald Brenneman / William Campbell vs Kerry Jantzi / Tony Humpage6-4, 6-2
2023-09-16Split 11
L#1 DoublesBill Henderson / Donald Brenneman vs John Droege / David Vant Hof6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDavid White / Zachary Wright vs Michael Mitchell / Arthur Kowitch6-1, 7-6
2023-09-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Hill / Jack Henry vs Tom Lonergan / Craig Mills6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Donald Brenneman
44W–55L career
16%84%0%
3.61
4
David Hill
48W–38L career
17%83%0%
3.59
4
Ben Jacobson
18W–35L career
21%79%0%
3.59
4
Jonathan Barg
24W–43L career
29%71%0%
3.54
4
Bill Henderson
108W–120L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Tim Leatherman
52W–36L career
3%95%2%
3.26
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.