Teams

LBrandt/TMacuga (Park Crossing)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-09vs SKwon (Carmel)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Brandt / Tish Macuga vs Brittany Newcomb / Natalie Stewart6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHilary Lee vs Melinda van Hecke3-6, 2-6
2022-05-02vs CAckels (PCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTish Macuga / Sarah Garner vs Lauren McNeely / Julia Murphy6-1, 6-1
2022-04-25vs JGentile (The Club at Longview)Split 11
W#1 DoublesTish Macuga / Andrea Kummer vs Peggy Chin / Alisa Hood6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHilary Lee vs Jessica Gentile5-7, 4-6
2022-04-11vs MMetzl/KJohnson (Sardis)Split 11
L#1 SinglesHilary Lee vs Emily Battle4-6, 2-3
W#2 DoublesTish Macuga / Molly Brown vs Kate Johnson / Judy Kilduff6-4, 6-3
2022-04-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesHilary Lee vs Kate Ellis6-0, 6-0
2022-03-29vs JSwanson (Springfield)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMolly Brown / Tish Macuga vs Julie Swanson / Annmarie Ringle6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHilary Lee vs Erica Turkus6-2, 6-2
2022-03-28vs JHutson (Carmel)Won 20
W#1 SinglesTish Macuga vs Jennifer Hutson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Brandt / Hilary Lee vs Virginia Ferguson / Kelly Kaiser3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-21vs CLee/KArenson (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Brandt / Tish Macuga vs Ursula Bonar / Stephanie Baker6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHilary Lee vs Lauren Kirchner6-0, 6-4
2022-02-21vs AWagner/KHoracek (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Brandt / Tish Macuga vs Angie Wagner / Ashley Whitley6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHilary Lee vs Felicia Ahn3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Laura Brandt
published
3.05
Sarah Garner
published
3.04
Hilary Lee
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
2.84
Tish Macuga
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3
2.53
Andrea Kummer
published 3
2.24
Nicole Wager
published
Molly Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tish Macuga + Andrea Kummer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Brandt
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Sarah Garner
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
3.5
Hilary Lee
105W–66L career · 9 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Tish Macuga
74W–77L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Andrea Kummer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
Nicole Wager
0W–9L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.24
Molly Brown
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.