Teams

Club Continental Alden

2025 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Men - Summer · 4.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-06vs Duval/Gordon/TL4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Rutstein / Kyle Whalen vs Erwin Renan Daclan / Karu Choudhary4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-18vs Duval/Gordon/TL4.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesElias Derke / Sean Kelly vs Erwin Renan Daclan / Greg Poore7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Comiskey / Jay Westercamp vs Joel Salvador / Max Villamor4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesROBERT DOZIER / Peter Martens vs Wei Wang / Rick Wedge6-1, 6-3
2025-09-11vs Duval/Gordon/TL4.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesJay Westercamp / Kyle Whalen vs Max Villamor / Rommel Marson7-6, 7-5
2025-09-04vs Duval/Gordon/TL4.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesElias Derke / Sean Kelly vs Erwin Renan Daclan / Rommel Marson6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Comiskey / Dan Calvo vs Max Villamor / Joel Salvador2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Martens / ROBERT DOZIER vs Wei Wang / Rick Wedge6-1, 6-3
2025-08-14vs Duval/Gordon/TL4.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesTroy Patton / Dan Calvo vs Erwin Renan Daclan / Greg Poore7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Comiskey / Jay Westercamp vs Stephen Bennett / Gunjan Gandhi6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJason Rice / James Racine vs Mersid Turjacanin / Wei Wang1-6, 4-6
2025-08-07vs Duval/Gordon/TL4.0MWon 10
W#1 DoublesElias Derke / Paul Vergara vs Erwin Renan Daclan / Greg Poore6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-31vs Duval/Gordon/TL4.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesEddie Kiep / Kyle Whalen vs Gunjan Gandhi / Max Villamor6-1, 7-5
2025-07-24vs Duval/Gordon/TL4.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElias Derke / Paul Vergara vs Erwin Renan Daclan / Greg Poore3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyle Whalen / Jay Westercamp vs Jason Crisostomo / Max Villamor4-6, 3-6
2025-07-10vs Duval/Gordon/TL4.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesEddie Kiep / Kyle Whalen vs Max Villamor / Joel Salvador0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Adam Rutstein
published 4.5
4.02
Brad Mossman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Sean Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Paul Vergara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Elias Derke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Andrew de Jong
published 4
3.70
David Reynolds
published 4
3.64
Troy Patton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Michael Alden
published
3.58
Jay Westercamp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Dan Calvo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.53
Eddie Kiep
published 3.5
3.37
Kyle Whalen
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Jason Rice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
ROBERT DOZIER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Peter Martens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Gebicke
published 3.5
3.20
John Comiskey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Garth Biggar
published 3
2.98
Jason Moret
published
2.84
James Racine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Danny Fehr
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Martens + ROBERT DOZIER6078% games+25.7% vs expected
Kyle Whalen + Paul Vergara9455% games−4.0% vs expected
Brad Mossman + Sean Kelly4254% games−4.6% vs expected
Brad Mossman + Paul Vergara6350% games−5.9% vs expected
Paul Vergara + Elias Derke213 matchesnot enough data
John Comiskey + Jay Westercamp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Rutstein
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Brad Mossman
77W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Sean Kelly
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Paul Vergara
96W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Elias Derke
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Andrew de Jong
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
David Reynolds
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Troy Patton
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michael Alden
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jay Westercamp
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Dan Calvo
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Eddie Kiep
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Kyle Whalen
110W–98L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.37
Jason Rice
27W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
ROBERT DOZIER
20W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Peter Martens
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Eric Gebicke
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Comiskey
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Garth Biggar
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Jason Moret
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
James Racine
19W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Danny Fehr
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.