Teams

CMiles (Queens)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-10-05vs MTurturro/CFagan (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRamonette Belen / Gladys Shinmoto vs Lori Quattlebaum / Mary Turturro6-3, 6-2
2022-09-29vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRamonette Belen / Gladys Shinmoto vs Amanda Cheek / Julie Hollifield4-6, 4-6
2022-09-28vs LHuntington (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Caitlin Steele vs Joanne Lee / Susan Welton7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-26vs MDwyer (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Qing Yang vs Debbie Starling / Tricia Magee4-6, 5-7
2022-09-21vs BBaker (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPatricia Fleming / Brenda Jandebeur vs Alana Carlton / Allison Purmort4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-14vs MMetzl (Sardis)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Morgan / Gladys Shinmoto vs Katherine Jay / Kathryn Martin2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-09-07vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesElaine Eisenbaum / Brenda Jandebeur vs Lauren Culp / Katelin Glass6-0, 6-3
2022-08-31vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Barbara Clement vs Judi Affeldt / Carolyn Koonts5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Patricia Fleming vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-24vs JLee (Colonel Beatty)Won 20
W#2 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Caitlin Steele vs Brittany Marshall / Nancy L Nicholson1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Fleming / Brenda Jandebeur vs Suzi Estes / Teresa Riley6-4, 6-2
2022-08-17vs JCohen/WRossi (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 DoublesRamonette Belen / Gladys Shinmoto vs Alpana Patel / Alyson Vaughan6-3, 6-1
2022-08-10vs ASunden (Raintree)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Patricia Fleming vs Megan Hua Shaul / Katrina Richards4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Ramonette Belen
published
3.04
Brenda Jandebeur
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
3.01
Gladys Shinmoto
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.95
Elaine Eisenbaum
published 3
2.73
Barbara Clement
published 3
Karen Morgan
published
Patricia Fleming
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ramonette Belen
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Brenda Jandebeur
166W–220L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Gladys Shinmoto
100W–119L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Elaine Eisenbaum
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Barbara Clement
14W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Karen Morgan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Fleming
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.