Teams

Westwood Caudill/Dean

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.35 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-15vs WOCC 6.5 combo - HamlinWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Caudill / Kacie Painter vs Joy Chenault / Cynthia Ryan6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKacie Painter / Melanie Grossman vs Becky McNeer / Donna Jamison6-7, 3-6
2024-08-24vs ACAC Davis Serve Slice Smash It!Won 10
W#2 DoublesKacie Painter / Samantha Wetzel vs Jane Parrish / Patti Bryan7-5, 5-3
2024-08-10vs RMC - SweeneyLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelanie Grossman / Kacie Painter vs Mary Spagnolo / Kimberly Garrett1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Kacie Painter
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.52
Hayley Herrin
published 3.5
3.44
Jordan Harper
published
3.39
Aubrey Moore
published 3.5
3.27
Cherie Warfield
published 3.5
3.26
Alysa Cargiulo
published 3.5
Cody Nystrom
published 3.5
3.16
Anne Trexler
published 3.5
3.15
Erica Kaplan
published 3.5
3.04
Kindra Kirkeby
published
3.02
Melanie Grossman
published
2.95
Allison Rosen
published 3
2.92
Samantha Wetzel
published
Donna Dean
published 3
2.63
Caroline Caudill
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kacie Painter + Jordan Harper404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kacie Painter
199W–63L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Hayley Herrin
26W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Jordan Harper
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Aubrey Moore
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Cherie Warfield
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alysa Cargiulo
22W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Cody Nystrom
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Anne Trexler
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Erica Kaplan
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Kindra Kirkeby
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
Melanie Grossman
20W–21L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
3.02
3
Allison Rosen
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
Samantha Wetzel
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Donna Dean
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Caroline Caudill
7W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.