Teams

PCreveling-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Weekend

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-22vs GLoFrese-EPHWon 20
W#2 DoublesPolly Creveling / Sydney Greenberg vs Gretchen LoFrese / Juliana Maul5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Fadelici / Elizabeth Parrish vs Janet Ranheim / Alexa Hartenstein7-5, 6-2
2024-09-15vs KNorris-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesPolly Creveling / Sharon Fadelici vs Kristi Laan / Lauren Redmond6-7, 4-6
2024-09-08vs BBlanc-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesMacKenzie Gokey / Sydney Greenberg vs Jennifer Anderson / Bracha Blanc1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Fadelici / Elizabeth Parrish vs Sheila Breckenridge / Cecilia Edgar3-6, 6-7
2024-08-25vs SGraff-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPolly Creveling / Sharon Fadelici vs Maria Sanchez / Virginia Brezac1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSydney Greenberg / Brittany Ramer vs Susana Harvey / Kristin Isaacs0-6, 0-6
2024-08-18vs LBible-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPolly Creveling / Sydney Greenberg vs Kristie Elliott / Nsimba Mahungu7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Fadelici / Elizabeth Parrish vs Samantha Collins / Rhiannon Ludington1-6, 3-6
2024-08-11vs KGreen-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Fadelici / Emily Glober vs Jeannette Brown / Adrianne Charleston7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-04vs JDeConto-ENOSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSydney Greenberg / MacKenzie Gokey vs Santae Cooper / Julie DeConto3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPolly Creveling / Sharon Fadelici vs Tammy Hood / Chelsea Donahue6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Polly Creveling
published
2.98
Elizabeth Parrish
published
2.93
Sharon Fadelici
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
Sydney Greenberg
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
MacKenzie Gokey
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Polly Creveling
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Elizabeth Parrish
10W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Sharon Fadelici
183W–140L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Sydney Greenberg
9W–36L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
MacKenzie Gokey
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.