Teams

NRRC 4.5 Day

2023 18&Over Women Day Winter · 4.5 Day

13 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-31vs TIA DREAM TEAMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Bevilacqua / Jani Mason vs Jiyon Lee / Sylvia Gross6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelen Chun / Loren Dinger vs Sarah Thompson / Melissa Shaw3-6, 1-6
2023-03-20vs Armonk Indoor: Street KnowledgeLost 02
L#2 DoublesLindsay Pell / Helen Chun vs Fiona Strachan / Sara Steinberg4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Bischoff / Carolyn Dorfman vs Sandi Sufrin / Elizabeth Vigano6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-03-03vs Grand Slam: SpindoctorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Levine / Jani Mason vs Gabrielle Collins / Emilie Chang7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristen Bevilacqua / Nicole Gassman vs Jorrie Bruffett / Johanna Olsborg6-3, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHelen Chun / Christina Bischoff vs Victoria Williams / Anne Teillon6-2, 6-2
2023-02-17vs TIA CCLLost 02
L#1 DoublesHelen Chun / Lindsay Pell vs Eugenia Kovalev / Louise Fischer2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Carolyn Dorfman vs Theresa Oconnor / Tara Blanchard0-6, 1-6
2023-02-10vs TIA DREAM TEAMLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Bevilacqua / Kimberly Mehrara vs Heather Rich / Lily Riedel6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Christine Levine vs Antaeya Foster / Heike Martens6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-01-27vs Grand Slam: SpindoctorsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Bevilacqua / Kristina Dorfman vs Gabrielle Collins / Julie Anderson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHelen Chun / Kathryn Biggs vs Heather Hecht / KATIE SCHMITZ6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-20vs Armonk Indoor: Street KnowledgeWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Gassman / Christine Levine vs Sandi Sufrin / Denise Sousa6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLindsay Pell / Kimberly Mehrara vs Lauren Lazar / Jill Newman6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristen Bevilacqua / Jani Mason vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-13vs TIA CCLLost 12
L#1 DoublesHelen Chun / Christine Levine vs Elichia Brown / Eugenia Kovalev6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Bevilacqua / Jani Mason vs Yvonne D'aquino / Cinta Delmonaco-Kemp4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Bischoff / Nicole Gassman vs Rachelle Theise / Theresa Oconnor4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TIA DREAM TEAM0815821180
2TIA CCL08121123206
3NRRC 4.5 Day0891432220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Homan
published 5
4.56
Christine Levine
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.23
Loren Dinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Jani Mason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.17
Kristina Dorfman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Kristen Bevilacqua
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.99
Kimberly Mehrara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Christina Bischoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Lindsay Pell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carolyn Dorfman
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.75
Helen Chun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Kathryn Biggs
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Nicole Gassman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jani Mason + Christine Levine8066% games+13.2% vs expected
Helen Chun + Christina Bischoff3256% games+12.8% vs expected
Jani Mason + Kristen Bevilacqua25858% games+6.3% vs expected
Helen Chun + Loren Dinger11453% games+4.9% vs expected
Kristina Dorfman + Kristen Bevilacqua4450% games+3.2% vs expected
Kristen Bevilacqua + Loren Dinger12755% games−1.2% vs expected
Lindsay Pell + Helen Chun6849% games−1.6% vs expected
Kristina Dorfman + Loren Dinger5849% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Adam Homan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Christine Levine
28W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.56
Loren Dinger
84W–54L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Jani Mason
110W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Kristina Dorfman
59W–57L career · 1 line in 2023
12%87%1%
4.17
Kristen Bevilacqua
132W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
Kimberly Mehrara
28W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Christina Bischoff
64W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Lindsay Pell
168W–139L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Carolyn Dorfman
16W–38L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Helen Chun
227W–220L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Kathryn Biggs
76W–92L career · 9 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Nicole Gassman
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.