Teams

BC-LLW-MCC/LeasaIreland

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.64 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-06vs BC-BJKTC/JoGarrettWon 10
W#2 DoublesMojgan Vakili / Elizabeth Alexander vs Ashley Cruse / Beejell Soco6-3, 6-2
2021-05-30vs BC-Kramer/DonnaAshcraftWon 10
W#1 SinglesMojgan Vakili vs Akiko Cohen6-3, 6-2
2021-05-16vs BC-PVTC/JanetYoungWon 10
W#1 SinglesMojgan Vakili vs Gail Starinieri6-1, 6-1
2021-04-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesMojgan Vakili vs Jane Doe6-1, 7-5
2021-04-03vs BC-MiraCosta/LananaGoldsteinWon 10
W#2 SinglesMojgan Vakili vs Robin Freni6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Elizabeth Shelor
published 4
3.75
Leasa Ireland
published
3.73
Serene Peterson
published
3.69
3.56
Melissa Crowley
published
3.49
Mojgan Vakili
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.38
Kristie Sherrill
published
3.36
Siobhan Carroll
published 3.5
3.34
Dawn Bush
published 3.5
3.30
Theresa Vendetti
published
3.28
Carre Porter
published 3.5
Angela Nelson
published 3.5
3.14
Tamara Smith
published
3.12
Aubrey Sedberry
published 3.5
2.94
Joi Gillam
published
Susan Myers
published
Yvonne Stevens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Siobhan Carroll + Carre Porter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Shelor
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.93
Leasa Ireland
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Serene Peterson
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Elizabeth Alexander
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Melissa Crowley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%33%67%
3.56
Mojgan Vakili
80W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
Kristie Sherrill
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Siobhan Carroll
62W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Dawn Bush
50W–40L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Theresa Vendetti
15W–14L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carre Porter
21W–19L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Angela Nelson
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tamara Smith
5W–14L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Aubrey Sedberry
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
Joi Gillam
1W–9L career · no lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
2.94
Susan Myers
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Yvonne Stevens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.