Teams

Ripley

2025 USTA League Adult 55 & Over - Spring Day League - HSV · 4.0 Women 55D3D

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-04-10vs Carterspring25Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCindy Pinkley / Michele Tate vs Kristy Palmer / Betsy DeCelle6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaty Ripley / Francesca Freudenberger vs Linda Powell / Carole Evans3-6, 2-6
2025-04-08vs Little 4.0 55 DaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichele Tate / Cindy Pinkley vs Jennifer Daniels / Charlotte Campbell7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaty Ripley / Marilyn Pinchock vs Debra Weaver / Alicia Howard0-6, 0-6
2025-04-01vs Carterspring25Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKaty Ripley / Karen Norton vs Melanie Williams / Vicki Mello1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFrancesca Freudenberger / Cindy Pinkley vs Leah Horton / Kristy Palmer4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Tate / Amy Wright vs Linda Lindberg / Carole Evans3-6, 0-6
2025-03-26vs Little 4.0 55 DayLost 12
W#1 DoublesFrancesca Freudenberger / Michele Tate vs Alicia Howard / Lori Tillery6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Wright / Karen Norton vs Stacy Mason / Jennifer Daniels6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaty Ripley / Marilyn Pinchock vs Jill Turner / Susan Turner1-6, 5-7
2025-03-21vs Carterspring25Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancesca Freudenberger / Leigh Weston vs Linda Powell / Lauren Plott2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Tate / Amy Wright vs Louise Carter / Linda Lindberg1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Pinkley / Marilyn Pinchock vs Maggie Brown / Vicki Mello4-6, 0-6
2025-03-19vs Little 4.0 55 DayLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Tate / Elizabeth Vickery vs Alicia Howard / Lori Tillery5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Pinkley / Debra Crowell vs Barbara Little / Stacy Mason0-6, 4-6
2025-03-11vs Carterspring25Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKaty Ripley / Elizabeth Vickery vs Vicki Mello / Maggie Brown3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Wright / Francesca Freudenberger vs Leah Horton / Linda Lindberg3-6, 6-7
2025-03-07vs Little 4.0 55 DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pugh / Michele Tate vs Regina Light / Barbara Little7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Vickery / Debra Crowell vs Kay Noller / Aimee League6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaty Ripley / Peggy Newberry vs Jill Turner / Susan Turner6-4, 6-3
2025-03-03vs Carterspring25Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFrancesca Freudenberger / Michele Tate vs Cheryl Saunders / Linda Powell6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pugh / Katy Ripley vs Andrea Foust / Melanie Williams7-5, 2-2
L#3 DoublesDebra Crowell / Amy Wright vs Leah Horton / Carole Evans0-6, 0-6
2025-02-27vs Little 4.0 55 DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaty Ripley / Jennifer Pugh vs Jill Turner / Barbara Little6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Vickery / Debra Crowell vs Aimee League / Stacy Mason4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeggy Newberry / Karen Norton vs Jennifer Daniels / Charlotte Campbell0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 55D3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindy Pinkley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Leigh Weston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Francesca Freudenberger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Michele Tate
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.40
Jennifer Pugh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Debra Crowell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Karen Norton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Peggy Newberry
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Elizabeth Vickery
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Katy Ripley
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marilyn Pinchock
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Weston + Francesca Freudenberger7655% games+6.1% vs expected
Debra Crowell + Elizabeth Vickery8458% games+4.2% vs expected
Katy Ripley + Jennifer Pugh2839% games−7.3% vs expected
Katy Ripley + Marilyn Pinchock044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Pinkley
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leigh Weston
72W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Francesca Freudenberger
30W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Michele Tate
18W–50L career · 8 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Jennifer Pugh
14W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Debra Crowell
25W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
Karen Norton
23W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.38
Peggy Newberry
19W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Elizabeth Vickery
53W–29L career · 10 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Katy Ripley
20W–72L career · 18 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Marilyn Pinchock
0W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.