Teams

Eagle Harbor - Townsend

2022 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-22vs The Plantation - HainesWon 10
W#2 DoublesTameka Bezue-Jackson / Kimberly Schoof vs Amy Balsimo / Elizabeth Marino6-4, 6-2
2022-06-09vs Duval/Latta-Raines (Clulb Cont)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJaye Andone / Kimberly Schoof vs Claudia Grosskruger / Megan Alfano6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-02vs Eagle Landing - NewmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Schoof / Nancy Wentz vs Ruth Jones-Looney / Danielle Euwema5-7, 3-6
2022-05-24vs The Plantation - HainesLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Wentz / Kimberly Schoof vs Brianne Toole / Mindy Ezring5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-05vs Duval/Latta-Raines (Clulb Cont)Won 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Wentz / Kimberly Schoof vs Donna Marceau / Timothe Romani6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Sutton / Kimberly Schoof vs Grace Sales / Jody Vance Cabrera4-6, 3-6
2022-04-14vs Pace Island - PinhoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaye Andone / Jolene Hamel vs Carol Merritt / Holly Fulton6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Jaye Andone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
3.31
Becky Gillan
published 3.5
3.29
Kandee Townsend
published
Debra Sutton
published 3.5
3.22
Nancy Wentz
published
3.21
Greta Pacilio
published 3.5
3.15
Jolene Hamel
published
3.01
Shelly Hamilton
published
Julie Stofan
published
Kimberly Schoof
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Sharon Cavins
published
Tracey Hess
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaye Andone + Kimberly Schoof4253% gamesnot enough data
Jolene Hamel + Nancy Wentz4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaye Andone
41W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Tameka Bezue-Jackson
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Becky Gillan
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Kandee Townsend
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Debra Sutton
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Wentz
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Greta Pacilio
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Jolene Hamel
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Shelly Hamilton
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Julie Stofan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Schoof
36W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Cavins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracey Hess
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.