Teams

Marsh

2024 Leon Adult 18 & Over · 3.0M Adult 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-30vs Leon/Suresh/18&Over3.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesNathan Bonanno / Russell Marsh vs Suresh Esakkimuthu / Vishnushankar Raja6-4, 6-2
2024-06-30vs Leon/Suresh/18&Over3.0MWon 10
W#2 SinglesJosh McEachin vs Rob Atkisson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-26vs Leon/Suresh/18&Over3.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Allee / Josh McEachin vs Sivakumaran Vanarajan / Vishnushankar Raja0-6, 3-6
2024-06-19Won 10
W#2 SinglesJosh McEachin vs Brandon Boyd7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-22vs Leon/Suresh/18&Over3.0MLost 01
L#1 SinglesJosh McEachin vs Amruth Kodela1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-08vs Leon/Suresh/18&Over3.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJosh McEachin / John Huffaker vs Rama Rao Katamneni / Moulali Shaik5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRussell Marsh / Yanliang Chen vs Sivakumaran Vanarajan / Raghu Indirajith2-6, 1-6
2024-05-01vs Leon/Suresh/18&Over3.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJosh McEachin / Craig Dennis vs Suresh Esakkimuthu / Vishnushankar Raja2-6, 3-6
2024-04-24vs Leon/Suresh/18&Over3.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJosh McEachin / Max Pearson vs Sivakumaran Vanarajan / Vishnushankar Raja2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0M Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
John Luque
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jack Grubbs
published 3
2.71
Josh McEachin
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
Derek Hartsfield
published 2.5
Max Pearson
published
Richard Gale
published
Russell Marsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Allee
published
Vamsi Batchu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Luque + Josh McEachin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
John Luque
74W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Jack Grubbs
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Josh McEachin
25W–48L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
Derek Hartsfield
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Max Pearson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Gale
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Russell Marsh
32W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Allee
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vamsi Batchu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.