Teams

Nguyen, Tam

2025 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-14vs Clark, MichaelWon 31
W#1 DoublesDoug Burgess / Kevin McKay vs Eli Sykes / Elkin Crews7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMatthew Gordon vs Tyler Mcintyre6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesScott Stanton / Chandler Strain vs Blake Kennedy / Matt Carpenter6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesTim Mask vs Michael Clark6-7, 4-6
2025-04-07vs Howell, BryanLost 14
L#1 DoublesMichael Foley / Steven Cialone vs Niven Walker / Daniel Pendleton5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatthew Gordon vs Bryce Ishee1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChandler Strain / David Thomas vs Andrew Stubbs / Andrew Haile5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJeffie Blake Smith vs Reed Wade7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDoug Burgess / Kevin McKay vs Nick Morgan / Will Russell Ward0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-31vs Norton, BrandonWon 32
W#1 DoublesDoug Burgess / Tim Mask vs Greg Williamson / Phillip Pace6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChandler Strain vs Drew Green4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTim Davis / Matthew Gordon vs Moin Imran / Jason Griffin6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJeffie Blake Smith vs JD Hosemann6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTam Nguyen / Jason McKnatt vs Rahul Chaddha / Hiren Arora3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-24vs Hardin, JeffLost 05
L#1 DoublesHunter Logan / Michael Foley vs Ricky Cousino / Brian Cronin3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJeffie Blake Smith vs Jackson Dulaney7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDoug Burgess / Tim Davis vs Daniel Phyfer / Jeffrey Carmody2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Gordon vs Hector Custode3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Stanton / Kevin McKay vs Joseph Oliver / Christian Waddell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-03vs Clark, MichaelWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatthew Gordon / Chandler Strain vs Elkin Crews / Reuben Harvey6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJeffie Blake Smith vs Tyler Mcintyre6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDoug Burgess / Tim Davis vs Chris Lee / Zach Myrick3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesScott Stanton / Kevin McKay vs Matt Carpenter / Blake Kennedy6-1, 7-5
2025-02-24vs Howell, BryanLost 14
L#1 DoublesChandler Strain / Hunter Logan vs Niven Walker / Daniel Pendleton4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJeffie Blake Smith vs Bryan Barksdale2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTim Davis / Doug Burgess vs Bryan Howell / Trey Clark6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMatthew Gordon vs Bryce Ishee1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Foley / Steven Cialone vs Jonathan Sims / Nick Morgan2-6, 1-6
2025-02-17vs Norton, BrandonWon 50
W#1 DoublesSteven Cialone / Tim Davis vs Thaddeus Welch / Jay Irving7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJeffie Blake Smith vs JD Hosemann6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChandler Strain / Tim Mask vs Sourav Dutta / Bryton Hixson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMatthew Gordon vs Moin Imran6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTam Nguyen / Doug Burgess vs Jason Griffin / John Louis7-5, 6-1
2025-02-10vs Hardin, JeffLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Gordon / Tam Nguyen vs Daniel Phyfer / Joseph Oliver7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeffie Blake Smith vs Jackson Dulaney3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDoug Burgess / Kevin McKay vs Lane Clower / Christian Waddell6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Chandler Strain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hunter Logan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jason McKnatt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Steven Cialone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Matthew Gordon
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Kevin McKay
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
Michael Foley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Doug Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.36
Tim Mask
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Scott Stanton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jeffie Blake Smith
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin McKay + Doug Burgess5350% games−9.6% vs expected
Doug Burgess + Jason McKnatt134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chandler Strain
48W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Hunter Logan
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason McKnatt
19W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Steven Cialone
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Matthew Gordon
18W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kevin McKay
30W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Michael Foley
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Doug Burgess
39W–53L career · 8 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.44
Tim Mask
13W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.36
Scott Stanton
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.35
Jeffie Blake Smith
13W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.