Teams

Martin

2025 Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-03vs JacobsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLezlie Moreland / Michael McGowan vs William Willard / Christina Ravekes2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMike Spivey / Cindy Mexcur vs DIANE CASANOVA / Mike Kelly0-6, 1-6
2025-08-29vs JacobsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLezlie Moreland / Michael McGowan vs William Willard / Elizabeth Jacobson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJames Forbes / Marie Sokoloff vs Scott Stickels / Donna Guarino6-1, 6-0
2025-08-24vs JacobsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Albers / James Forbes vs Masako Murphy / Michael Remoll5-7, 0-6
2025-08-20vs JacobsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Forbes / Lezlie Moreland vs George Sybert / Donna Guarino2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-04vs JacobsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Forbes / Marie Sokoloff vs Maria Birnkammer / Michael Remoll6-4, 6-1
2025-08-03vs JacobsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Ritter / Marie Sokoloff vs Maria Birnkammer / Michael Smith6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael McGowan / Lezlie Moreland vs Mike Kelly / DIANE CASANOVA6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Helen Patterson
published 4
3.49
Michael McGowan
published
3.46
James Forbes
published 3.5
3.43
Marie Sokoloff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Lezlie Moreland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Holly Hill
published 3.5
3.34
Michael Ritter
published
3.33
Joseph Flynn
published
3.33
Cindy Mexcur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Melissa Albers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Greg Richardson
published 3
Mike Spivey
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Patterson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
Michael McGowan
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
James Forbes
25W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Marie Sokoloff
277W–199L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Lezlie Moreland
157W–166L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Holly Hill
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
Michael Ritter
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Joseph Flynn
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Cindy Mexcur
161W–157L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Melissa Albers
86W–110L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Greg Richardson
0W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Spivey
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.