Teams

Hains Point Killer Bees

2023 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-08-26vs Smash GirlsLost 02
L#1 SinglesPamela Acero vs Tara Rethore2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRachael Uhland vs Jennifer Brooks3-6, 2-6
2023-08-19vs CourtneyWon 20
W#2 SinglesAlexis Aafedt vs Julia Arnold6-2, 6-5
W#3 SinglesPamela Acero vs Emily Hoffman6-3, 5-5
2023-08-12vs Piney RunLost 01
L#3 SinglesRachael Uhland vs LaMia Jones1-6, 1-5
2023-08-05vs NETworkLost 12
W#1 SinglesAlexis Aafedt vs Kali Keller6-4, 4-2
L#2 SinglesPamela Acero vs Chamaya Hutchens0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRachael Uhland vs Eileen Dombrowski1-6, 2-6
2023-07-30vs DC Tennis ClubLost 02
L#2 SinglesPamela Acero vs Amy Hunter2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKate Noyes vs Noeline Arul1-6, 2-6
2023-07-22vs Smash GirlsLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlexis Aafedt vs Sonoko Ozawa2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKate Noyes vs Lisa Cacciatore1-6, 0-6
2023-07-16vs CourtneyLost 01
L#2 SinglesPamela Acero vs Kim Quarantello1-6, 1-6
2023-07-15vs Piney RunLost 12
W#1 SinglesAlexis Aafedt vs Socheata Kim6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesRachael Uhland vs Chelbe Williams0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKate Noyes vs Ashton Brown1-6, 2-6
2023-07-09vs NETworkLost 03
L#1 SinglesRachael Uhland vs Kali Keller2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesPamela Acero vs Leslie-Ann Williams1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKate Noyes vs Tiffanee Gale0-6, 3-4
2023-07-08vs DC Tennis ClubWon 10
W#1 SinglesPamela Acero vs Noeline Arul3-6, 5-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chloe Zhang
published 3.5
2.93
Alexis Aafedt
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Deborah Wright
published 3
2.72
Rachael Uhland
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.66
Pamela Acero
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Kate Noyes
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexis Aafedt + Pamela Acero314 matchesnot enough data
Rachael Uhland + Pamela Acero213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chloe Zhang
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Alexis Aafedt
44W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Deborah Wright
0W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachael Uhland
15W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Pamela Acero
36W–65L career · 7 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
Kate Noyes
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.