Teams

LCTA18/Keiper/CTC

USTA 18 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-20vs LCTA18M/Beck/CTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorge Fullbright / Yuliia McDonald vs Matthew Whipple / Paula Olive6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-13vs LCTA18/Bernstein/CreeksideLost 01
L#3 DoublesGeorge Fullbright / Oxana Smith vs Gino Anacleto / Mary Anacleto4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-30vs LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St. AndrewsLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorge Fullbright / Oxana Smith vs Shaun Roberson / Sarah Brady7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-09vs LCTA18/O'Rourke/MaybankLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaylee Jacoob / George Fullbright vs Christophe Paume / Erica Wimpory3-6, 2-6
2023-04-25vs LCTA18/Britton/MaybankWon 10
W#3 DoublesGeorge Fullbright / Oxana Smith vs Daniel Broomall / Andrea Woolum6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Morgan Scruggs
published
3.75
Kaylee Jacoob
published
3.50
Adam Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
William Keiper
published
3.35
Will Scanlon
published
3.29
Oxana Smith
published
3.25
Yuliia McDonald
published
3.14
George Fullbright
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.10
Katie Sedor
published
3.00
Shannon Smoak
published
2.98
Paul Callander
published
2.72
Richard Horsfall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Fullbright + Oxana Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Morgan Scruggs
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Kaylee Jacoob
33W–45L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
3.5
Adam Smith
129W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
William Keiper
62W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Will Scanlon
81W–44L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Oxana Smith
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
Yuliia McDonald
56W–42L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
George Fullbright
253W–249L career · 11 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Katie Sedor
10W–31L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Shannon Smoak
9W–53L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Paul Callander
22W–36L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Richard Horsfall
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.