Teams

BC-WestEnd/DebbiTran

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.45 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Elizabeth Rogers
published 3.5
3.41
Debbie Tran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Yuko Dundas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Suzanne Scott
published
3.13
Cheryl Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Huong Mary Lai
published 3.5
3.04
Mary Kay Dyes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Barbara Hemmerich
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Theresa Riley
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.00
Regina Enriquez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Serena Jaklich
published
Dandan Zhang
published 3
2.57
Cheryl Unrein
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Williams + Barbara Hemmerich6748% games+2.6% vs expected
Barbara Hemmerich + Theresa Riley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Rogers
22W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
3.44
4
Debbie Tran
98W–98L career · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Yuko Dundas
96W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Suzanne Scott
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cheryl Williams
85W–155L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Huong Mary Lai
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Mary Kay Dyes
39W–114L career · 5 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Barbara Hemmerich
79W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Theresa Riley
64W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Regina Enriquez
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Serena Jaklich
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Dandan Zhang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cheryl Unrein
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.