Teams

TTC Edwards 6.5 Combo

2026 Tuscaloosa USTA Combo Doubles - Weeknight 40&over · 6.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-17vs TTC Duren 6.5 Combo 40+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJoshua Lee / Peter Zimmer vs Dustin Clary / Craig Fairburn4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames King / Raymond Poore vs Glen Akins / Avinash NICHANI6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Welch / Chad Jaggers vs James Taylor / Tony Sheffield4-6, 3-6
2026-08-12vs TTC Duren 6.5 Combo 40+Split 11
L#2 DoublesJames Smith / Jonathan Wingo vs Aaron Sincroft / Jared Phillips7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChad Jaggers / Matthew Hammond vs Tony Sheffield / Roman Duren2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-04vs TTC Duren 6.5 Combo 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesSteve Buchheit / Scott Smith vs Glen Akins / Mike Shelton6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames King / Raymond Poore vs Craig Fairburn / Michael Oliver6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Zimmer / David Welch vs Jared Phillips / James Taylor5-7, 2-6
2026-07-29vs TTC Duren 6.5 Combo 40+Won 21
L#1 DoublesPeter Zimmer / Joshua Lee vs Aaron Sincroft / Craig Fairburn6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Buchheit / Scott Miller vs James Taylor / Mike Shelton6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJonathan Wingo / James Smith vs Dustin Clary / Avinash NICHANI6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Steve Buchheit
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Jonathan Wingo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Matthew Hammond
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Chad Jaggers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Raymond Poore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Peter Zimmer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Hammond + Steve Buchheit6650% games+8.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steve Buchheit
28W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
Jonathan Wingo
17W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Matthew Hammond
25W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Chad Jaggers
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Raymond Poore
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Peter Zimmer
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.