Teams

HMTC RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-30vs LVTA PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesHelen Crews / Mary Wilson vs Laurel McClellan / Wendy Schaffer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCheri Gipson / CYNDI ROTHMAN vs Trish Lebsack / Linda Miller6-3, 6-4
2023-08-23vs CSU GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Smerud / Helen Crews vs Erin Hauser-Roe / Hanna Grow-Morales5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCYNDI ROTHMAN / Laurie Anderson vs Carrie Galyardt / Becky Rosetti-Solley1-6, 1-6
2023-08-16vs CSU WHITEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Smerud / Helen Crews vs Rachel Robertson / Edie LaFonte6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCYNDI ROTHMAN vs Rachel Fernandez-Grant6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheri Gipson / Laurie Anderson vs Cynthia McGrorey / Mel Fernandez4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-09Won 20
W#1 DoublesHelen Crews / Cheri Gipson vs Linda Miller / Gina Bevino6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCYNDI ROTHMAN vs Renee Davis2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-02vs CSU GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Wilson / Helen Crews vs Jaime Donnelly / Susan Starr Nelson7-5, 6-0
2023-07-26vs CSU WHITELost 01
L#1 SinglesCYNDI ROTHMAN vs Rachel Robertson2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Sara Chan
published
3.67
CYNDI ROTHMAN
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Helen Crews
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.52
Cheri Gipson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheri Gipson + Helen Crews6549% games−17.9% vs expected
Cheri Gipson + CYNDI ROTHMAN224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Chan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.96
4
CYNDI ROTHMAN
68W–70L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Helen Crews
61W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Cheri Gipson
45W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.