Teams

Twin Hickory Yu

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-14vs Burkwood CookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Spencer Blanton / Michelle Yu vs Ellen Bedichek / Donna Mourtzakis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Sandy Cook6-2, 6-4
2024-06-12vs SCC CacciottiWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Spencer Blanton vs Morgan Schwartz6-2, 6-4
2024-06-05vs SCC NoblesLost 02
L#1 SinglesMary Spencer Blanton vs Becky McNeer5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Catherine Baldridge4-6, 3-6
2024-05-31vs KRA Fleck/WalekLost 01
L#1 SinglesMary Spencer Blanton vs Stephanie Murtaugh0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-29vs CCV-ReifsniderLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Alexandra Huffman1-6, 0-6
2024-05-24vs TDC-LongWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Cynthia Mistretta6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMary Spencer Blanton vs Heather Long7-6, 6-2
2024-05-22vs Wyndham-EccardLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Cris Latief3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-05-20vs Hermitage- WiertelLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Joanna Bergeron5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Deirdre Vaughan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
Holly Hamilton
published 3.5
3.24
Mary Spencer Blanton
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.24
Corinne Skevington
published 3.5
3.20
Laura Armour
published
3.17
Michelle Yu
published
3.11
Jennifer Schwarz
published
3.04
Cathy Parker
published 3
2.74
Mary Apruzzese
published
2.68
Penny Kivett
published
2.61
Suzanne Pericle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Armour + Jennifer Schwarz1740% games−5.6% vs expected
Corinne Skevington + Jennifer Schwarz134 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Vaughan + Jennifer Schwarz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deirdre Vaughan
162W–178L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Holly Hamilton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Spencer Blanton
82W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Corinne Skevington
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Laura Armour
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Michelle Yu
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Jennifer Schwarz
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Cathy Parker
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.04
Mary Apruzzese
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.74
Penny Kivett
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Suzanne Pericle
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
Uma Maheswari Subramaniam
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.