Teams

Coleman - Tequila Mockingbirds

2025 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-12vs PlexicoWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Sicairos / Colleen Stoltz vs Ashley Plexico / Wendy Hopkins6-0, 6-2
2025-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesErin Green / Nancy Sicairos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-29vs PlexicoWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Becer / Lily Riedel vs Catalina Tafur / Vanessa Ogilvie6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesColleen Stoltz / Nancy Sicairos vs Jeanne Baily / Carolyn Greis5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-13vs PlexicoWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Becer / Moira Smith vs Jennifer Beets / Ashley Plexico6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMoo Hackett / Annie Richardson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-29vs PlexicoWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Viar / Jennifer Eveges vs Catalina Tafur / Margaret Sita6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNancy Sicairos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMoo Hackett / Erin Green vs Vanessa Ogilvie / Jennifer Beets2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-22vs PlexicoWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Reed / Heather Viar vs Carolyn Greis / Catalina Tafur6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmma Shine / Grete Bravo vs Candice Rininger / Margaret Sita6-1, 6-0
2025-04-15vs PlexicoWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Eveges / Lily Riedel vs Jennifer Beets / Elizabeth Solander6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Reed / Heather Viar vs Erin Kaplan / Beth Kaufman6-4, 6-0
2025-04-10vs PlexicoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErin Green / Grete Bravo vs Carolyn Greis / Catalina Tafur6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Sicairos / Moo Hackett vs Jutta Nohra / June Wheatley6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Annie Richardson
published 4.5
4.46
Emma Shine
published
4.28
Erin Green
published
4.27
Lily Riedel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Colleen Stoltz
published 4.5
4.21
Heather Viar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Christine Becer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Grete Bravo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Jessica Coleman
published
4.13
Shruti Srinivasan
published
3.98
Nancy Sicairos
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.91
Moo Hackett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.44
Lori Reed
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Coleman + Emma Shine5260% games+9.6% vs expected
Lily Riedel + Grete Bravo10456% games−2.9% vs expected
Erin Green + Nancy Sicairos2446% games−5.4% vs expected
Lily Riedel + Jessica Coleman314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Sicairos + Moo Hackett404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Green + Annie Richardson303 matchesnot enough data
Heather Viar + Moo Hackett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Annie Richardson
23W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.58
Emma Shine
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
Erin Green
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Lily Riedel
152W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Colleen Stoltz
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Heather Viar
239W–145L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Christine Becer
270W–177L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Grete Bravo
70W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
Jessica Coleman
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
Shruti Srinivasan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Nancy Sicairos
367W–75L career · 5 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
4.5
Moo Hackett
91W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.91
Lori Reed
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.