Teams

JSteyl (OPRC)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 9.5 Women - Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-05vs DWest (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Gardiner / Debbie Titlestad vs Diana West / Kindell Schmitt3-6, 1-6
2023-09-28vs JVarn (Palisades)Split 11
L#2 DoublesSharon Gehrig / Kristin Hennessy vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Lina Clarke6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLindsey Stuckey / Debbie Titlestad vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-02vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbie Titlestad / Kristen Montgomery vs Sara Thompson / Darri Thayaprasat0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Steyl / Sharon Gehrig vs Natalie Osman / Jaclyn Rock1-6, 0-6
2023-08-17vs JVarn (Palisades)Split 11
W#2 DoublesJulie Efremoff / Janet Steyl vs Jessica Varn / Tanya Hecht6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEnid Randall / Debbie Titlestad vs Alison Lacy Sherrill / Lina Clarke6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-10vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Efremoff / Sharon Gehrig vs Brittney Desmond / Sanjana Sudhir3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 9.5 Women - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Janet Steyl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Stephanie Ladley
published
4.23
Sharon Gehrig
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.22
Paula Beecher
published
4.18
Jennifer Fayad
published
4.18
Jennifer Gardiner
published
4.08
Debbie Titlestad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.08
Enid Randall
published
Lindsey Stuckey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Enid Randall + Jennifer Fayad224 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Gehrig + Janet Steyl314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Janet Steyl
44W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
Stephanie Ladley
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Sharon Gehrig
44W–28L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Paula Beecher
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.22
Jennifer Fayad
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
Jennifer Gardiner
21W–18L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Debbie Titlestad
52W–51L career · 8 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
Enid Randall
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
4.08
Lindsey Stuckey
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.