Teams

CACM GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs DTP TEALSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSarah Stavros / Sheida Lahabi vs Amy Twardowski / Erin Dunn6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCamille Ford vs Susan Rosenthal6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoLynn White / Kristy Sawyer vs Ashley Lougheed / Jamie Stroupe5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNicole Connelly / Susan Sundeen vs AMY SITZE / Karen Ryan6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-07vs WP YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristy Sawyer / Sheida Lahabi vs Jennifer Digan / Alexandria Farawell1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Stavros vs Cameran Jewell1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTara Wiebe / Shannon Elmore Bell vs Allison Malesky / Autumn Brockman6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarly Schwab / Nicole Connelly vs Bethany Benish / Kala Koehn2-6, 5-7
2026-06-29vs CM GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKristy Sawyer / Camille Ford vs Kathy Ammann / Wendy Thorpe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSheida Lahabi vs Laurie Korneffel3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoLynn White / Carly Schwab vs Beth Hasse / Anne Doubet2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicole Connelly / Susan Sundeen vs Alison Thompson / Megan Draper4-6, 3-6
2026-06-22vs EM REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesShannon Elmore Bell / Tara Wiebe vs Jennifer Grumann / Liz May2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJoLynn White vs Robin Farris3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Stavros / Sheida Lahabi vs Sarah Godley / Kelly Trotter0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Sundeen / Nicole Connelly vs Lindsay Hand / Jill Wichlens3-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs DTC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSheida Lahabi / Tara Wiebe vs Pamela Marsh / Dana Pianowski6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCamille Ford vs Cherlyn Linden3-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Stavros / Carly Schwab vs Marcy Eastman / Trisha Cohen1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Sundeen / Kristy Sawyer vs Kari Cao / Amanda Alpert1-6, 2-6
2026-06-08vs WP GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTara Wiebe / Camille Ford vs Denise Geiger / Alexia Eslan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRocio Perera vs Katy Massanari3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Stavros / Carly Schwab vs Laurie Wagner / Theresa Wheeler6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Sundeen / JoLynn White vs Laura Lapsys / Susan Anderson1-6, 4-6
2026-06-01vs SKY REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesShannon Elmore Bell / Tara Wiebe vs Rebecca Schneider / Jessica Dewees7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCamille Ford vs Sharlene Keithley6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKristy Sawyer / Sarah Stavros vs Becky McBride / Kate Dillon6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoLynn White / Rocio Perera vs Melissa Cantu / Susan Cleveland0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Camille Ford
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Kristy Sawyer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.71
Tara Wiebe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Shannon Elmore Bell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
JoLynn White
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Sarah Stavros
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.58
Sheida Lahabi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.50
Rocio Perera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.48
Nicole Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Susan Sundeen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Carly Schwab
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Stephanie Bolsei
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JoLynn White + Kristy Sawyer4163% games+6.8% vs expected
JoLynn White + Rocio Perera6554% games+3.3% vs expected
Sarah Stavros + Carly Schwab3644% games+2.5% vs expected
Shannon Elmore Bell + Tara Wiebe6550% games+0.3% vs expected
Stephanie Bolsei + Carly Schwab1433% games−4.7% vs expected
Susan Sundeen + Nicole Connelly134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Sundeen + Carly Schwab044 matchesnot enough data
Camille Ford + Sheida Lahabi224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Camille Ford
24W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Kristy Sawyer
18W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Tara Wiebe
53W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Shannon Elmore Bell
88W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
JoLynn White
24W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Sarah Stavros
25W–61L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Sheida Lahabi
11W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Rocio Perera
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Nicole Connelly
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Susan Sundeen
6W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.40
2.5
Carly Schwab
22W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Stephanie Bolsei
11W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.