Teams

Laurel Oak Rosenberg

2025 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 4.0 M Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-26vs SSC AkiermanLost 01
L#3 DoublesDave Barcomb / DONALD LAGASSE vs Nate Macksey / Ron Forzani3-6, 3-6
2025-03-15vs Sarasota/Casanova/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Malave / David Rosenberg vs Joseph Casanova / Jeff Thompson2-6, 3-6
2025-02-22vs Sarasota/Casanova/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Malave / Lance Schilling vs Antonio Nicolini / Jeff Thompson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-01vs Sarasota/Casanova/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoe Malave / Tim Mihm vs Jonathan Cranos / Jeff Thompson2-6, 0-6
2025-01-27vs SSC AkiermanWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Rosenberg / Dave Barcomb vs Nate Macksey / Ron Forzani2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-11vs Sarasota/Casanova/40&Over4.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesLuke Anderson / Joe Malave vs Larry Denyes / Wayne Osher5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Dave Barcomb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Kent Perry
published
3.67
AJ Albright
published 4
3.62
Joe Malave
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
David Rosenberg
published 4
3.34
Bradley Sutter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lance Schilling
published
Mike Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Mihm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Barcomb + Joe Malave6352% gamesnot enough data
Dave Barcomb + David Rosenberg123 matchesnot enough data
AJ Albright + Kent Perry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dave Barcomb
54W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Kent Perry
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
AJ Albright
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Joe Malave
127W–103L career · 9 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
David Rosenberg
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Bradley Sutter
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Lance Schilling
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Beasley
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Mihm
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.