Teams

Tate 2.5 - NC - Southaven

2025 Singles League 18&Over-NC · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-18vs Cleveland 2.5 - NC - SouthavenWon 20
W#1 SinglesWENDY Vines vs Connie Clarkson6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMarti Montgomery vs Mary Gates Heidelberg6-1, 6-1
2025-11-13vs Cleveland 2.5 - NC - SouthavenWon 30
W#1 SinglesYongqin Zhang vs Danielle Paxton6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMarti Montgomery vs Morgan Baker6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKatie Gobbell vs Madison Cleveland6-2, 6-3
2025-11-11vs DoyleLost 12
L#1 SinglesRoni Terry vs Samantha Phillips4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesWENDY Vines vs Kim Yount6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesTracy Gallagher vs Jennifer Doyle0-6, 3-6
2025-11-04vs DoyleWon 30
W#1 SinglesYongqin Zhang vs Michelle Corbin6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMarti Montgomery vs Samantha Phillips6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesWendy Dawson vs Tracey Butler5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-02vs Cleveland 2.5 - NC - SouthavenWon 30
W#1 SinglesRoni Terry vs Christa Smith6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMarti Montgomery vs Morgan Baker6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesWendy Dawson vs Madison Cleveland7-5, 6-4
2025-10-30vs DoyleWon 21
W#1 SinglesRoni Terry vs Kim Yount6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesYongqin Zhang vs Julie Moore6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKatie Gobbell vs Jennifer Doyle3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Yongqin Zhang
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.62
Marti Montgomery
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Roni Terry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Wendy Dawson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.42
WENDY Vines
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.27
Katie Gobbell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.09
Tracy Gallagher
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yongqin Zhang
32W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
Marti Montgomery
26W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Roni Terry
35W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Wendy Dawson
23W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
WENDY Vines
29W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Katie Gobbell
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Tracy Gallagher
3W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.