Teams

CCMV

2023 SUMMER 18&O Mixed · Summer 9.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-07-09vs Players ClubLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Worthen / Rebecca Spears Hinze vs Walter Samora / Maria Zivick6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChris Styrsky / Natalie Saul vs Patrick McColgan / Deidra Engle1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Glick / Mara Sheley vs Noah Elliott / Anne Zivick6-7, 2-6
2023-06-30vs Players ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesMara Sheley / Chris Styrsky vs Griffin Celleghin / Deidra Engle4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCassie Brungarth / Ryan Worthen vs Matthew Esber / Dori Easdale4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKeith Haigh / Katy Wiles vs Johaun Cheng / Maria Zivick7-5, 6-2
2023-06-11vs Players ClubLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Worthen / Katy Wiles vs Noah Elliott / Maria Zivick6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMara Sheley / Chris Styrsky vs Patrick McColgan / Anne Zivick6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeith Haigh / Ellyn Spagna vs Griffin Celleghin / My Linh Li3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Summer 9.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Players Club50123773
2CCMV0531226172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Mara Sheley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
Ellyn Spagna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Rebecca Spears Hinze
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Carolen Welch
published 4
Chris Styrsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Cassie Brungarth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Katy Wiles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Keith Haigh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Glick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Saul
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Worthen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mara Sheley
56W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.73
4.5
Ellyn Spagna
34W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
Rebecca Spears Hinze
66W–55L career · 1 line in 2023
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Carolen Welch
106W–66L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Chris Styrsky
0W–3L career · type M · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cassie Brungarth
8W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Katy Wiles
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Keith Haigh
24W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Glick
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Natalie Saul
15W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Worthen
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.