← Teams

CRRC-Paulsen

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Nick Hooker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Brandon Shell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.48
Brad Johnson
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Christian Paulsen
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.14
Ryan Owens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.08
Michael Ogden
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.82
Erik Bucher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-06-29Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Chris Olmsted vs Robert Hesslink / Jamil Panni6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChristian Paulsen vs William Allers6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesErik Bucher / Ryan Owens vs Michael McTague / Jeremy Geschwind5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2019-06-21Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Brad Johnson vs Eric Ayers / David Rabbino6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Ogden vs Adam Smith6-0, 6-2
2019-06-15Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Robert Glenn vs Marley Petersen / Brandon Brown6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesRyan Owens vs Matt Bader6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristian Paulsen / Chris Olmsted vs Charles Thomas Craven / ALFREDO ALANIS6-4, 6-3
2019-06-01Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Coleman Cobb vs Hoon Shin / Yuehai Liang6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBrad Johnson vs Colin Looi6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMichael Ogden vs Yogesh Patel7-5, 6-4
2019-05-19Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker - (DQ)* / Ryan Owens vs Todd Hennelly / Robert Gettle7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChristian Paulsen vs Ray Lee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Chris Olmsted vs Sam Lumetta / David Manfield7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesErik Bucher vs Jeff Welter6-2, 6-3
2019-05-04Won 3–2
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker - (DQ)* / Ryan Owens vs Sam Lumetta / Mike Moore1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrad Johnson vs Ray Lee7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErik Bucher / Michael Ogden vs Robert Gettle / Eli Lamb7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJeff Welter vs Brandon Shell - (DQ)*6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristian Paulsen / Chris Olmsted vs John Slominski / David Gewant6-3, 6-2
2019-04-27Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker - (DQ)* / Ryan Owens vs Joe Saylor / Skip Potter6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMatt Elmgren vs Brandon Shell - (DQ)*6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Ogden / Erik Bucher vs Dave Hardman / Neal Linegar6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChristian Paulsen vs James King4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-04-20Lost 2–3
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker - (DQ)* / Ryan Owens vs Andrew Huck / Brandon Brown6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCharles Thomas Craven vs Brandon Shell - (DQ)*7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristian Paulsen / Erik Bucher vs Matthew Thompson / Andrew Geisler3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrad Johnson vs Matt Bader6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Ogden / Ronald Skoletsky vs Wesley Eader / Karl Kropp6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Brandon Shell
42W–34L career
9%91%0%
3.62
3.5
Brad Johnson
196W–102L career
0%87%13%
3.48
3.5
Christian Paulsen
112W–67L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
Michael Ogden
38W–23L career
27%72%1%
3.08
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07
3
Erik Bucher
79W–60L career
0%98%1%
2.82

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.