Teams

The Teton Topspinners

2023 WY Tri-Level · Jackson Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WYOMING

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-17vs Jackson RacquetsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenny May / Renee Havens vs Laura Cuddie / Judith Kaelber6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMimi Freymann / Kelly Matthews vs Cheri Witz / Joy Bowles2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSara van Genderen / Cathleen French vs Miranda Hoover / Shelley Olson4-6, 0-6
2023-07-12vs Jackson RacquetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny May / Kelsey Pedersen vs Judith Kaelber / Laura Cuddie3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Havens / Diane McGee vs Linda Merigliano / Joy Bowles3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Matthews / Sara van Genderen vs Shelley Olson / Megan Jenkins6-1, 6-1
2023-07-05vs Jackson RacquetsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenny May / Kelsey Pedersen vs Judith Kaelber / Ellen Fales3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMimi Freymann / Jennifer Mei vs Cheri Witz / Anne Moran2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelinda Day / MacKenzie Krall vs Miranda Hoover / Shelley Olson2-6, 4-6
2023-06-28vs Jackson RacquetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMimi Freymann / Jennifer Mei vs Laura Cuddie / Heather Silverman2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelsey Pedersen / Kelly Matthews vs Anne Moran / Ellen Fales1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMelinda Day / Libby Erker vs Kelly Milligan / Miranda Hoover7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-21vs Jackson RacquetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRenee Havens / Jennifer Mei vs Judith Kaelber / Heather Silverman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMimi Freymann / Diane McGee vs Linda Merigliano / Cheri Witz2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLibby Erker / Sara van Genderen vs Kelly Milligan / Megan Jenkins0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-19vs Jackson RacquetsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenny May / Diane McGee vs Judith Kaelber / Laura Cuddie2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelinda Day / Renee Havens vs Linda Merigliano / Anne Moran1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCathleen French / Kelly Matthews vs Kelly Milligan / Miranda Hoover4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Jackson Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Jennifer Mei
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Jenny May
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mimi Freymann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Diane McGee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Cathleen French
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Melinda Day
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kelly Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kelsey Pedersen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Libby Erker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
MacKenzie Krall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Havens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sara van Genderen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mimi Freymann + Jennifer Mei3448% games−23.7% vs expected
Renee Havens + Mimi Freymann224 matchesnot enough data
Diane McGee + Mimi Freymann314 matchesnot enough data
Renee Havens + Jennifer Mei213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Mei
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Jenny May
25W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.80
4
Mimi Freymann
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Diane McGee
7W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Cathleen French
2W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Melinda Day
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Matthews
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelsey Pedersen
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Libby Erker
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
MacKenzie Krall
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Renee Havens
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara van Genderen
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.