Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Cracroft

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.5W

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-12vs Sunpro-Parker/StringhamLost 02
L#2 Female DoublesSharon Larkin / Linda Carruthers vs Kristi Parker / Jennifer Stringham2-6, 1-6
L#3 Female DoublesWendy Johnstun / Marilee Cracroft vs AnnMarie Chadwick / Katri Koehle2-6, 3-6
2023-12-05vs Ivory Ridge-Rowland/AubreyLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesWendy Johnstun / Marilee Cracroft vs Jennifer Elison / Jennifer Hardin3-6, 1-6
2023-11-28vs Sports Mall-England/RozsaWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesMarilee Cracroft / Kala Riester vs Aja-Lynn Domingo / Brooke Rollins6-2, 6-1
2023-11-17vs Sports Mall-Shoff/BrownLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesCarla Stoddard / Sharon Larkin vs Martha Brown / DeeAnn Henderson4-6, 1-6
2023-11-14vs Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/DagleySplit 11
W#2 Female DoublesSharon Larkin / Carla Stoddard vs Jen Dagley / Wendy Heywood6-3, 6-1
L#3 Female DoublesJoyce Krawiecki / Linda Carruthers vs Jocelyn Bennion / Jessica Larson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-11-07vs Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/EwingLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesLindsey Little / Janine Nemelka vs Molly Northrup / Sharree Olsen3-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Shoff/Brown602138115
2Liberty Park Tennis-Swensen/Sampson6016821161
3Sunpro-Parker/Stringham5116820172
4Salt Lake Tennis-Cracroft4215922182
5Sunpro-Westover/Hall42111329189
6Cottonwood Club-Annunziata3315923203
7Sports Mall-Lake/Knowlton3316824206
8Liberty Park Tennis-Handlon/Assemi33131128207
9Ivory Ridge-Adams3391531214
10Ivory Ridge-Rowland/Aubrey24101430205
11Ogden-Andersen2491533225
12Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Dagley2471736232
13Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/Ewing1581636240
14Sports Mall-England/Rozsa1571737238
15Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Chandromouli0671736237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Kala Riester
published 4
Ashley Phyfe
published 4
3.43
Stephanie Benton
published
Ingrid Hansen
published 3.5
3.21
Janine Sholeff
published 3.5
3.19
Elizabeth Michie
usually #1 Female Doubles 80%, also #2 Female Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Lindsey Little
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Carla Stoddard
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Mary Harrison
published
2.87
Joyce Krawiecki
usually #3 Female Doubles 40%, also #1 Female Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.84
Marilee Cracroft
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Linda Carruthers
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
Brooke McCloskey
published
Kathy Travers
published
Sharon Larkin
published
Wendy Johnstun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janine Sholeff + Carla Stoddard5451% games+0.2% vs expected
Ingrid Hansen + Elizabeth Michie141252% games−1.5% vs expected
Sharon Larkin + Carla Stoddard213745% games−4.1% vs expected
Sharon Larkin + Mary Harrison21036% games−6.1% vs expected
Sharon Larkin + Linda Carruthers3541% games−7.5% vs expected
Brooke McCloskey + Marilee Cracroft2538% games−9.0% vs expected
Carla Stoddard + Marilee Cracroft4741% games−10.5% vs expected
Carla Stoddard + Ingrid Hansen6645% games−10.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kala Riester
98W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
4.07
4
Ashley Phyfe
50W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Benton
57W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Ingrid Hansen
30W–36L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Janine Sholeff
101W–94L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Elizabeth Michie
92W–67L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Lindsey Little
30W–87L career · 1 line in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carla Stoddard
124W–150L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Mary Harrison
25W–76L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91
3.5
Joyce Krawiecki
10W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Marilee Cracroft
55W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Linda Carruthers
69W–129L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Brooke McCloskey
12W–70L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Travers
7W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Larkin
93W–206L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Johnstun
46W–74L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.