Teams

WTC: NY: 4.5 SS 18+ Whackhanders

2024 18&Over Men · 4.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-17vs Southern: NRRC: MoonballersLost 23
W#1 DoublesBrent Wiedmer / Matthew Pascale vs Kristopher Burrell / Andre Benjamin6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDaniel Fraser vs Jean-Benoit Belin3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Arnett / Nadir Lahmeur vs Younes Amar / Lukas Dow1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLuis Joel Chirinos Paucar vs Andres Woolcott6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBen Hofling / Aditya Mukund Subramanian vs Mark Robertson / Eric Perlmutter3-6, 3-6
2024-07-10vs Southern: NRRC: MoonballersLost 23
W#1 DoublesMatthew Pascale / Brent Wiedmer vs Jean-Benoit Belin / Garrett Ahitow6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDaniel Fraser vs Younes Amar6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesUlrich Brandt-Pollmann / Luis Joel Chirinos Paucar vs Kristopher Burrell / Andre Benjamin7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMark Kemna vs Michael Levy1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Merkin / Jonathan Rosen vs Eric Perlmutter / Mark Robertson2-6, 1-6
2024-06-26vs Chestnut Ridge Racquet ClubLost 14
L#1 DoublesMatthew Pascale / Brent Wiedmer vs Marc Lowitz / Tom Givone6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDavid Arnett vs Benjamin Singer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGregory Shannon / Jonathan Rosen vs Liam Berkowitz / Wulf Lueckerath3-6, 2-4
W#2 SinglesDaniel Fraser vs Hayes Hopple6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Kendall / Ben Hofling vs Matthew Wallis / Paul Kissner3-6, 4-6
2024-06-20vs Life TimeWon 50
W#1 DoublesJonathan Rosen / Gregory Shannon vs Henry Wang / Jacob Ben'Meir6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDaniel Fraser vs Harris Ackerman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrent Wiedmer / Aditya Mukund Subramanian vs Jason Halperin / Greg Mermelstein6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMatthew Pascale vs Zachary Benmeir6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Kendall / Ryan Merkin vs Jack Halperin / Milo Kris6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAditya Mukund Subramanian / Brent Wiedmer vs Richard Brail / Christopher Zobler6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDaniel Fraser vs Craig Sofer6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBen Hofling / Matthew Pascale vs Jeffrey Binder / Brian Kinstlinger6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDavid Arnett vs Chris Jones6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteven Weiser / Matthew Kendall vs David Barnett / Joshua Winograd3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-05vs Sportime Westchester LILost 23
L#1 DoublesGregory Shannon / Jonathan Rosen vs Augustin Huynh / Rafael Romero4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDaniel Fraser vs Nathan Anderson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Pascale / Ulrich Brandt-Pollmann vs Iker Fernandez / Adam Friedman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPhilip Futernik vs Thibault SOULA4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Arnett / Ben Hofling vs Jeffrey Carpenter / Gregory Proudian6-1, 6-2
2024-05-18vs Chestnut Ridge Racquet ClubSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrent Wiedmer / Aditya Mukund Subramanian vs Tsuyoshi Togo / Kenta Togo7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNadir Lahmeur vs Andreas Landgrebe3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesUlrich Brandt-Pollmann / Matthew Pascale vs Liam Berkowitz / Jesse Brundige7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDaniel Fraser vs Matthew Wallis6-3, 6-1
2024-05-15vs WTC: NY: 4.5 SS 18+ Court JestersWon 32
W#1 DoublesDaniel Fraser / Brent Wiedmer vs Lawrence Green / Lawrence Hirsch6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMark Kemna vs Patrick Lennon6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHaydn Palliser / Matthew Pascale vs Dan Forrester / Andrew McGoey6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesPhilip Futernik vs Ben Sulsky4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Arnett / Ben Hofling vs Andy Blotner / Mark Cukaj4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: NRRC: Moonballers08251431282
2WTC: NY: 4.5 SS 18+ Whackhanders08221841330
3WTC: NY: 4.5 SS 18+ Court Jesters08211948402
4Life Time08112962405
5Pleasantville Tennis Club: Livin’ On A Prayer0892963435

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Brent Wiedmer
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.30
Ben Hofling
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.29
Aditya Mukund Subramanian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
Daniel Fraser
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Matthew Kendall
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Andrew Finn
published 4.5
David Byer
published 4.5
Gregory Shannon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Haydn Palliser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
David Arnett
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.14
Mark Kemna
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.10
Ulrich Brandt-Pollmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Ryan Merkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Luis Joel Chirinos Paucar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Matthew Pascale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Nadir Lahmeur
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Philip Futernik
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Steven Weiser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Arnett + Ben Hofling4261% games+8.0% vs expected
Brent Wiedmer + Ulrich Brandt-Pollmann9360% games+5.5% vs expected
Brent Wiedmer + Aditya Mukund Subramanian4357% games+4.0% vs expected
Brent Wiedmer + Matthew Pascale224 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Pascale + Andrew Finn314 matchesnot enough data
Mark Kemna + Aditya Mukund Subramanian213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Kemna + David Arnett213 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Merkin + Matthew Kendall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brent Wiedmer
40W–25L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Ben Hofling
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Aditya Mukund Subramanian
84W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Daniel Fraser
20W–11L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
Matthew Kendall
60W–40L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Andrew Finn
22W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
David Byer
8W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Gregory Shannon
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Haydn Palliser
44W–48L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
David Arnett
29W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.17
Mark Kemna
40W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
4.14
Ulrich Brandt-Pollmann
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.10
Ryan Merkin
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Luis Joel Chirinos Paucar
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Pascale
34W–23L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nadir Lahmeur
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Futernik
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Weiser
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.